» Articles » PMID: 21373300

Pain Treatment in Post-traumatic Hip Fracture in the Elderly: Regional Block Vs. Systemic Non-steroidal Analgesics

Overview
Journal Int J Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2011 Mar 5
PMID 21373300
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This prospective, randomized double-blind study, conducted over 19 months in a tertiary care ED, sought to determine if a fascia-iliaca regional anesthetic block provides better and safer pain relief than does parenteral analgesia.

Aims: This study also aimed to determine the effectiveness of parenteral NSAID analgesia for acute hip fractures.

Methods: Patients >65 years old presenting at an adult ED with acute hip fractures were randomized upon presentation to the ED into two groups (A and B) using numbers generated by the EPI-INFO™ (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) program. The randomization list was kept by one of the authors who did not interact with the patients. Two groups of patients were to receive either (A) a fascia-iliaca block with bupivacaine and parenteral saline injection, or (B) the same block with saline and an IV NSAID injection. Upon admission to the study, vital signs such as blood pressure, mean blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and pain-intensity measurements [using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)] were obtained and repeated at 15 min, 2 h and at8 h. The occurrence of complications was registered.

Results: One hundred seventy-five patients were randomized, and 21 were excluded from participation. The remaining 154 patients were grouped as: group A (n = 62) or group B (n = 92). The mean pain level on admission to the ED for all patients, assessed with the VAS, was 8.21 ± 0.91 (CI 95%: 6.43-9.99); in group A the VAS was 7.6 ± 0.22 and in group B 8.5 ± 0.72 (p = 0.411). At 15-min evaluation, values were: group A 6.24 ± 0.17 and group B 2.9 ± 0.16 (p < 0.001). At the 2-h assessment, values were: group A 1.78 ± 0.11 and group B 2.3 ± 1.16 (p = 0.764). At 8 h the VAS for group A was 2.03 ± 0.12 and for group B 4.4 ± 0.91 (p = 0.083).

Conclusion: THIS STUDY DEMONSTRATES THAT: (1) parenteral NSAIDs are very effective as analgesics after hip fractures in elderly patients, (2) fascia-iliaca regional blocks are nearly as effective for up to about 8 h after administration and (3) regional fascia-iliaca blocks effectively control post-hip fracture pain. (4) Fascia iliaca regional block has a rapid onset.

Citing Articles

History of the Nerve Block.

Go D, Gould M, Ganti L Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024; 16:125260.

PMID: 39624469 PMC: 11610913. DOI: 10.52965/001c.125260.


Outcomes of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patients with Fragility Hip Fractures in the Philippine General Hospital: A 6-month Prospective Study.

Sy Su K, Balmadrid I Acta Med Philipp. 2024; 58(18):49-55.

PMID: 39483310 PMC: 11522349. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9460.


Effects of liposomal bupivacaine in preoperative fascia iliac block on postoperative pain and delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a study protocol for a randomised, parallel controlled prospective clinical study.

Hao Y, Li W, Zheng M, Li X, Wu X, Yu Z BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e079067.

PMID: 38184312 PMC: 10773377. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079067.


NSAIDs for Pain Control During the Peri-Operative Period of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Pommier W, Minoc E, Morice P, Lescure P, Guillaume C, Lafont C Drugs Aging. 2023; 41(2):125-139.

PMID: 37880500 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01074-w.


Peripheral Nerve Block and Peri-operative Neurocognitive Disorders in Older Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

Jia B, Tang Y, Wei C, Zhao G, Li X, Shi Y Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023; 14:21514593231186722.

PMID: 37435444 PMC: 10331079. DOI: 10.1177/21514593231186722.


References
1.
Scott J . Osteoporosis and hip fractures. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990; 16(3):717-40. View

2.
Braithwaite R, Col N, Wong J . Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51(3):364-70. DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51110.x. View

3.
Ray N, Chan J, Thamer M, Melton 3rd L . Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12(1):24-35. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.24. View

4.
Samelson E, Zhang Y, Kiel D, Hannan M, Felson D . Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(5):858-62. PMC: 1447174. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.5.858. View

5.
Monzon D, Iserson K, Vazquez J . Single fascia iliaca compartment block for post-hip fracture pain relief. J Emerg Med. 2007; 32(3):257-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.08.011. View