» Articles » PMID: 21370507

Potential Use of Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.) Endophytic Fungi As Seed Treatment Agents Against Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita

Overview
Date 2011 Mar 4
PMID 21370507
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Seed treatment with endophytic fungi has been regarded as an effective method for plant parasitic nematode control. Endophytic fungi from cucumber seedlings were isolated and screened for their potential to be used as seed treatment agents against Meloidogyne incognita. Among the 294 isolates screened, 23 significantly reduced galls formed by M. incognita in greenhouse test. The 10 most effective isolates were Fusarium (5), Trichoderma (1), Chaetomium (1), Acremonium (1), Paecilomyces (1), and Phyllosticta (1). Their control efficacies were repeatedly tested and their colonizations as well as in vitro activity against M. incognita were studied. They reduced the number of galls by 24.0%-58.4% in the first screening and 15.6%-44.3% in the repeated test, respectively. Phyllosticta Ph511 and Chaetomium Ch1001 had high colonizations on both the roots and the aboveground parts of cucumber seedlings. Fusarium isolates had colonization preference on the roots, their root colonizations ranging from 20.1% to 47.3% of the total root area. Trichoderma Tr882, Paecilomyces Pa972, and Acremonium Ac985 had low colonizations on both the roots and the aboveground parts. Acremonium Ac985, Chaetomium Ch1001, Paecilomyces Pa972, and Phyllosticta Ph511 produced compounds affecting motility of the second stage juveniles of M. incognita. Based on these results, Chaetomium Ch1001 was considered to have the highest potential as a seed treatment agent for M. incognita biocontrol.

Citing Articles

Nematicidal and Insecticidal Compounds from the Laurel Forest Endophytic Fungus sp.

Diaz C, Andres M, Bolanos P, Gonzalez-Coloma A Molecules. 2024; 29(19).

PMID: 39407499 PMC: 11477566. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29194568.


Fungal Endophytes as Mitigators against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Crop Plants.

Gowtham H, Hema P, Murali M, Shilpa N, Nataraj K, Basavaraj G J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(2).

PMID: 38392787 PMC: 10890593. DOI: 10.3390/jof10020116.


Deciphering the mechanisms, hormonal signaling, and potential applications of endophytic microbes to mediate stress tolerance in medicinal plants.

Pandey P, Tripathi A, Dwivedi S, Lal K, Jhang T Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1250020.

PMID: 38034581 PMC: 10684941. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1250020.


Comparison of Fungal Genera Isolated from Cucumber Plants and Rhizosphere Soil by Using Various Cultural Media.

Cheng C, Zhang M, Niu Y, Zhang M, Geng Y, Deng H J Fungi (Basel). 2023; 9(9).

PMID: 37755042 PMC: 10532442. DOI: 10.3390/jof9090934.


Chaetomium globosum KPC3: An Antagonistic Fungus Against the Potato Cyst Nematode, Globodera rostochiensis.

Bairwa A, Dipta B, Mhatre P, Venkatasalam E, Sharma S, Tiwari R Curr Microbiol. 2023; 80(4):125.

PMID: 36872375 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-023-03228-w.


References
1.
Goswami J, Pandey R, Tewari J, Goswami B . Management of root knot nematode on tomato through application of fungal antagonists, Acremonium strictum and Trichoderma harzianum. J Environ Sci Health B. 2008; 43(3):237-40. DOI: 10.1080/03601230701771164. View

2.
Sharon E, Bar-Eyal M, Chet I, Herrera-Estrella A, Kleifeld O, Spiegel Y . Biological Control of the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology. 2008; 91(7):687-93. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.7.687. View

3.
Gallery R, Dalling J, Arnold A . Diversity, host affinity, and distribution of seed-infecting fungi: a case study with Cecropia. Ecology. 2007; 88(3):582-8. DOI: 10.1890/05-1207. View

4.
Kalele D, Affokpon A, Coosemans J . Efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 against root knot nematodes in tomato under greenhouse conditions. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2007; 72(1):209-13. View

5.
Arnold A, Mejia L, Kyllo D, Rojas E, Maynard Z, Robbins N . Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(26):15649-54. PMC: 307622. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2533483100. View