» Articles » PMID: 21368127

Two Developmental Modules Establish 3D Beak-shape Variation in Darwin's Finches

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2011 Mar 4
PMID 21368127
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bird beaks display tremendous variation in shape and size, which is closely associated with the exploitation of multiple ecological niches and likely played a key role in the diversification of thousands of avian species. Previous studies have demonstrated some of the molecular mechanisms that regulate morphogenesis of the prenasal cartilage, which forms the initial beak skeleton. However, much of the beak diversity in birds depends on variation in the premaxillary bone. It forms later in development and becomes the most prominent functional and structural component of the adult upper beak/jaw, yet its regulation is unknown. Here, we studied a group of Darwin's finch species with different beak shapes. We found that TGFβIIr, β-catenin, and Dickkopf-3, the top candidate genes from a cDNA microarray screen, are differentially expressed in the developing premaxillary bone of embryos of species with different beak shapes. Furthermore, our functional experiments demonstrate that these molecules form a regulatory network governing the morphology of the premaxillary bone, which differs from the network controlling the prenasal cartilage, but has the same species-specific domains of expression. These results offer potential mechanisms that may explain how the tightly coupled depth and width dimensions can evolve independently. The two-module program of development involving independent regulating molecules offers unique insights into how different developmental pathways may be modified and combined to induce multidimensional shifts in beak morphology. Similar modularity in development may characterize complex traits in other organisms to a greater extent than is currently appreciated.

Citing Articles

Developmental bias as a cause and consequence of adaptive radiation and divergence.

Stansfield C, Parsons K Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1453566.

PMID: 39479512 PMC: 11521891. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1453566.


Cellular, Molecular, and Genetic Mechanisms of Avian Beak Development and Evolution.

Schneider R Annu Rev Genet. 2024; 58(1):433-454.

PMID: 39227135 PMC: 11777486. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-111523-101929.


Beakiation: how a novel parrot gait expands the locomotor repertoire of living birds.

Dickinson E, Young M, Granatosky M R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231397.

PMID: 38298389 PMC: 10827422. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231397.


Zebrafish crocc2 mutants exhibit divergent craniofacial shape, misregulated variability, and aberrant cartilage morphogenesis.

Packard M, Gilbert M, Tetrault E, Albertson R Dev Dyn. 2023; 252(7):1026-1045.

PMID: 37032317 PMC: 10524572. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.591.


The cellular basis of cartilage growth and shape change in larval and metamorphosing Xenopus frogs.

Rose C PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0277110.

PMID: 36634116 PMC: 9836273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277110.


References
1.
Petren K, Grant P, Grant B, Keller L . Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin's finches: the role of peripheral isolation. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14(10):2943-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02632.x. View

2.
Shapiro M, Marks M, Peichel C, Blackman B, Nereng K, Jonsson B . Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks. Nature. 2004; 428(6984):717-23. DOI: 10.1038/nature02415. View

3.
Milat F, Ng K . Is Wnt signalling the final common pathway leading to bone formation?. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009; 310(1-2):52-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.06.002. View

4.
Soons J, Herrel A, Genbrugge A, Aerts P, Podos J, Adriaens D . Mechanical stress, fracture risk and beak evolution in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1543):1093-8. PMC: 2830229. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0280. View

5.
Rodda S, McMahon A . Distinct roles for Hedgehog and canonical Wnt signaling in specification, differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast progenitors. Development. 2006; 133(16):3231-44. DOI: 10.1242/dev.02480. View