Reduced-dose Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Efficacy Depends on Degree of B Cell Depletion
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Studies comparing 500 mg rituximab and 1,000 mg rituximab doses in rheumatoid arthritis have yielded conflicting data on clinical outcomes, but in all of these studies a subgroup of patients has had excellent responses at the lower dose. Historically, it was considered that rituximab uniformly depleted B cells at both doses. Using highly sensitive assays, we have shown that B cell depletion is variable and predictive of clinical response. Using the same techniques, we undertook the present study to test the hypothesis that the level of B cell depletion, rather than the rituximab dose, determines clinical response.
Methods: Nineteen patients were treated with two 500-mg infusions of rituximab, and 61 patients were treated with two 1,000-mg infusions of rituximab. Highly sensitive flow cytometry was performed at 0, 2, 6, 14, and 26 weeks. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response rates at 6 months were compared between patients with and those without complete depletion at each dose.
Results: The median B cell count was numerically higher at all time points following therapy in the 500 mg rituximab group. Twenty-five percent of patients in the 500 mg rituximab group had complete depletion at 2 weeks, compared with 49% of those in the 1,000 mg rituximab group. Complete depletion at 2 weeks after treatment with 500 mg rituximab was associated with lower baseline preplasma cell counts (P = 0.047). Most patients responded after either dose, but response was related to B cell depletion. Notably, in the 500 mg rituximab group all patients with complete depletion had a EULAR good response (P = 0.011).
Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that the degree of B cell depletion, rather than the dose of rituximab, determines clinical response. It may be possible to predict which patients will respond to lower-dose rituximab, and this may allow more cost-effective treatment.
Defining immune reset: achieving sustained remission in autoimmune diseases.
Junt T, Calzascia T, Traggiai E, da Costa A, Gergely P, Schett G Nat Rev Immunol. 2025; .
PMID: 40044810 DOI: 10.1038/s41577-025-01141-w.
Cellular therapies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.
Franco-Fuquen P, Figueroa-Aguirre J, Martinez D, Moreno-Cortes E, Garcia-Robledo J, Vargas-Cely F J Transl Autoimmun. 2025; 10:100264.
PMID: 39931050 PMC: 11808717. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100264.
De Meyst E, Bertrand D, Joly J, Doumen M, Marchal A, Thelissen M Trials. 2024; 25(1):681.
PMID: 39407334 PMC: 11476693. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08542-7.
CAR T cell therapy for refractory pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a new era of hope?.
Stojkic I, Harper L, Coss S, Kallash M, Driest K, Lamb M Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2024; 22(1):72.
PMID: 39118067 PMC: 11308704. DOI: 10.1186/s12969-024-00990-4.
Do the Outcomes of Clinical Efficacy Trials Matter in Regulatory Decision-Making for Biosimilars?.
Kirsch-Stefan N, Guillen E, Ekman N, Barry S, Knippel V, Killalea S BioDrugs. 2023; 37(6):855-871.
PMID: 37831324 PMC: 10581956. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00631-4.