» Articles » PMID: 21352927

A Bayesian Model of Shape and Appearance for Subcortical Brain Segmentation

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Mar 1
PMID 21352927
Citations 1098
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Automatic segmentation of subcortical structures in human brain MR images is an important but difficult task due to poor and variable intensity contrast. Clear, well-defined intensity features are absent in many places along typical structure boundaries and so extra information is required to achieve successful segmentation. A method is proposed here that uses manually labelled image data to provide anatomical training information. It utilises the principles of the Active Shape and Appearance Models but places them within a Bayesian framework, allowing probabilistic relationships between shape and intensity to be fully exploited. The model is trained for 15 different subcortical structures using 336 manually-labelled T1-weighted MR images. Using the Bayesian approach, conditional probabilities can be calculated easily and efficiently, avoiding technical problems of ill-conditioned covariance matrices, even with weak priors, and eliminating the need for fitting extra empirical scaling parameters, as is required in standard Active Appearance Models. Furthermore, differences in boundary vertex locations provide a direct, purely local measure of geometric change in structure between groups that, unlike voxel-based morphometry, is not dependent on tissue classification methods or arbitrary smoothing. In this paper the fully-automated segmentation method is presented and assessed both quantitatively, using Leave-One-Out testing on the 336 training images, and qualitatively, using an independent clinical dataset involving Alzheimer's disease. Median Dice overlaps between 0.7 and 0.9 are obtained with this method, which is comparable or better than other automated methods. An implementation of this method, called FIRST, is currently distributed with the freely-available FSL package.

Citing Articles

Comparing repeatability metrics for quantitative susceptibility mapping in the head and neck.

Cherukara M, Shmueli K MAGMA. 2025; .

PMID: 40024974 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-025-01229-3.


Circulating biomarkers and neuroanatomical brain structures differ in older adults with and without post-traumatic stress disorder.

Quigley B, Wellington N, Levenstein J, Dutton M, Boucas A, Forsyth G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7176.

PMID: 40021745 PMC: 11871017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91840-0.


Hippocampal vascularization pattern and cerebral blood flow cooperatively modulate hippocampal tolerable amount of Aβ deposition in the occurrence of MCI.

Xu Y, Wei H, Du R, Wang R, Zhu Y, Zhao T Fluids Barriers CNS. 2025; 22(1):22.

PMID: 39994752 PMC: 11854383. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-025-00635-y.


Extended Technical and Clinical Validation of Deep Learning-Based Brainstem Segmentation for Application in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Gesierich B, Sander L, Pirpamer L, Meier D, Ruberte E, Amann M Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(3):e70141.

PMID: 39936343 PMC: 11815323. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70141.


Functional Connectivity of the Scene Processing Network at Rest Does Not Reliably Predict Human Behavior on Scene Processing Tasks.

Watson D, Andrews T eNeuro. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39890456 PMC: 11820959. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0375-24.2024.


References
1.
Xu Y, Valentino D, Scher A, Dinov I, White L, Thompson P . Age effects on hippocampal structural changes in old men: the HAAS. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(3):1003-15. PMC: 3785795. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.034. View

2.
Helmich R, Derikx L, Bakker M, Scheeringa R, Bloem B, Toni I . Spatial remapping of cortico-striatal connectivity in Parkinson's disease. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(5):1175-86. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp178. View

3.
Davatzikos C, Tao X, Shen D . Hierarchical active shape models, using the wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 22(3):414-23. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2003.809688. View

4.
Meulenbroek O, Rijpkema M, Kessels R, Olde Rikkert M, Fernandez G . Autobiographical memory retrieval in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(1):331-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.082. View

5.
Li S, Shi F, Pu F, Li X, Jiang T, Xie S . Hippocampal shape analysis of Alzheimer disease based on machine learning methods. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(7):1339-45. PMC: 7977642. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0620. View