» Articles » PMID: 21349884

What Do Parents and Carers Think About Routine Outcome Measures and Their Use? A Focus Group Study of CAMHS Attenders

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2011 Feb 26
PMID 21349884
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Currently service user involvement in routine outcomes monitoring has been minimal, particularly in Children's services. There needs to be a more sustained effort to involve service users because of the valuable information that they could provide for service development and improvement. Focus groups were conducted with service users, including parents, carers and young people from a London CAMHS. Their views were elicited on routine outcomes monitoring in general, three specific approaches and suggestions about what else might be important to capture when measuring outcomes. The focus groups raised a number of issues pertinent to routine outcomes monitoring in general, including the reliability of answers, the need for the measures to reflect more than just a tick-box approach and that different people will have different perspectives. Analysis also focused on feedback about the three specific measures discussed. It is important that service users are involved in the process of outcome measurement, from the development of measures, to their application in therapeutic encounters and in service development. Outcome monitoring needs to become a more collaborative process in order that services are measuring what service users think is important, as most would agree that a service should deliver the outcomes that its users want to see.

Citing Articles

Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review.

Whitmyre E, Esposito-Smythers C, Lopez Jr R, Goldberg D, Liu F, Defayette A Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024; 27(4):909-942.

PMID: 39477858 PMC: 11609122. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z.


Implementing Measurement-Based Care in a Youth Partial Hospital Setting: Leveraging Feedback for Sustainability.

Donelan J, Douglas S, Willson A, Lester T, Daly S Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024; 52(1):128-145.

PMID: 38575735 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01358-2.


Process and Implementation Elements of Measurement Feedback Systems: A Systematic Review.

Rognstad K, Engell T, Fjermestad K, Wentzel-Larsen T, Kjobli J Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023; 52(1):74-87.

PMID: 38153585 PMC: 11703878. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01325-3.


Decreased Balance Function in School-Aged Children with Behavioral Problems.

Matsunaga N, Ito T, Ito Y, Mizusawa J, Gu Y, Sanada S Brain Sci. 2022; 12(1).

PMID: 35053860 PMC: 8773709. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12010117.


The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms.

Hall C, Guo B, Valentine A, Groom M, Daley D, Sayal K PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0218518.

PMID: 31216327 PMC: 6583960. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218518.