» Articles » PMID: 21345903

Emotional Distress in Infertile Women and Failure of Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Meta-analysis of Prospective Psychosocial Studies

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Feb 25
PMID 21345903
Citations 96
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine whether pretreatment emotional distress in women is associated with achievement of pregnancy after a cycle of assisted reproductive technology.

Design: Meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies.

Data Sources: PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, PsychNET, ISI Web of Knowledge, and ISI Web of Science were searched for articles published from 1985 to March 2010 (inclusive). We also undertook a hand search of reference lists and contacted 29 authors. Eligible studies were prospective studies reporting a test of the association between pretreatment emotional distress (anxiety or depression) and pregnancy in women undergoing a single cycle of assisted reproductive technology. Review methods Two authors independently assessed the studies for eligibility and quality (using criteria adapted from the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale) and extracted data. Authors contributed additional data not included in original publication.

Results: Fourteen studies with 3583 infertile women undergoing a cycle of fertility treatment were included in the meta-analysis. The effect size used was the standardised mean difference (adjusted for small sample size) in pretreatment anxiety or depression (priority on anxiety where both measured) between women who achieved a pregnancy (defined as a positive pregnancy test, positive fetal heart scan, or live birth) and those who did not. Pretreatment emotional distress was not associated with treatment outcome after a cycle of assisted reproductive technology (standardised mean difference -0.04, 95% confidence interval -0.11 to 0.03 (fixed effects model); heterogeneity I²=14%, P=0.30). Subgroup analyses according to previous experience of assisted reproductive technology, composition of the not pregnant group, and timing of the emotional assessment were not significant. The effect size did not vary according to study quality, but a significant subgroup analysis on timing of the pregnancy test, a contour enhanced funnel plot, and Egger's test indicated the presence of moderate publication bias.

Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis should reassure women and doctors that emotional distress caused by fertility problems or other life events co-occurring with treatment will not compromise the chance of becoming pregnant.

Citing Articles

Is the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) a Useful Tool for Predicting IVF Success?.

Sljivancanin D, Vidakovic S, Tepavcevic D, Petrovic B, Sljivancanin U, Dokic M Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1).

PMID: 39859081 PMC: 11766609. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010099.


The impact of spillover and crossover effects of job stressors on pregnancy rates in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments.

Turgeman Lupo K, Bokek-Cohen Y, Miller N, Herzberger E, Wiser A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39755849 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03373-6.


Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review).

Hu Y, Wang W, Ma W, Wang W, Ren W, Wang S Int J Mol Med. 2024; 55(2).

PMID: 39704226 PMC: 11670866. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2024.5475.


An insurmountable obstacle: Experiences of Chinese women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Ying X, Zhou Y, Jin Y, Wu D, Kong L, Dong P PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311660.

PMID: 39374240 PMC: 11458033. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311660.


Identification of Psychological Symptom Clusters and Their Influencing Factors in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology in China: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Song D, Jiang W, Hu S, Zhu R, Pu C, Wang Y Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:1493-1504.

PMID: 39281323 PMC: 11402353. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S468644.


References
1.
Lintsen A, Verhaak C, Eijkemans M, Smeenk J, Braat D . Anxiety and depression have no influence on the cancellation and pregnancy rates of a first IVF or ICSI treatment. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(5):1092-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den491. View

2.
Demyttenaere K, Bonte L, Gheldof M, Vervaeke M, Meuleman C, Vanderschuerem D . Coping style and depression level influence outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1998; 69(6):1026-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00089-2. View

3.
Demyttenaere K, NIJS P, Evers-Kiebooms G, Koninckx P . Coping and the ineffectiveness of coping influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization through stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1992; 17(6):655-65. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4530(92)90024-2. View

4.
Leushuis E, van der Steeg J, Steures P, Bossuyt P, Eijkemans M, van der Veen F . Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 15(5):537-52. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp013. View

5.
Boivin J, Takefman J . Stress level across stages of in vitro fertilization in subsequently pregnant and nonpregnant women. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64(4):802-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57858-3. View