Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement for High-risk Aortic Stenosis Patients Not Suitable for Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Feasibility and Outcome
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: High-risk patients with aortic stenosis are increasingly referred to specialist multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for consideration of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A subgroup of these cases is unsuitable for TAVI, and high-risk conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) is undertaken. We have studied our outcomes in this cohort.
Methods: Data prospectively collected between March 2008 and November 2009 for patients (n = 28, nine male) undergoing high-risk AVR were analysed. The mean age was 78.4 ± 9.2 years. The mean additive EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) was 10.0 ± 3.6 and mean logistic EuroSCORE was 19.9 ± 18.8. Three patients had undergone previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Results: The mean ejection fraction was 51 ± 16%, mean valve area 0.56 ± 0.19 cm², and mean peak gradient 91 ± 27 mm Hg. Ascending aortic, right axillary artery and femoral artery cannulation was used in 64%, 29% and 7% of cases, respectively. Median cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 84 (68-143) min and 111 (94-223) min. The median (range) inserted valve size was 21 (19-25) mm. Median intensive care and overall hospital stay were 5 (2-37) and 11 (5-44) days, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 4% (one patient). Postoperative complications included re-operation for bleeding (7%), renal failure (21%), tracheostomy (14%), sternal wound infection (7%), atrial fibrillation (25%) and permanent pacemaker implantation (7%). Kaplan-Meier survival at median follow-up of 359 (148-744) days was 81% (one further death of non-cardiac aetiology). Quality-of-life assessment at follow-up also yielded satisfactory results.
Conclusions: MDT assessment of high-risk aortic stenosis in the era of TAVI has increased the number of referrals. Conventional open surgery remains a valid option for these patients, with acceptable in-hospital mortality and early/midterm outcomes but high in-hospital morbidity.
The impact of frailty in aortic valve surgery.
Berastegui Garcia E, Camara Rosell M, Moret Ruiz E, Garcia I, Badia Gamarra S, Fernandez Gallego C BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):426.
PMID: 33109120 PMC: 7590696. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01716-3.
Surgical treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis in the modern era - review.
Kwiecien A, Hrapkowicz T, Filipiak K, Przybylski R, Kaczmarczyk M, Kowalczuk A Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018; 15(3):188-195.
PMID: 30310399 PMC: 6180026. DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2018.78445.
Wolf S, Fischer S Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018; 169(11-12):293-303.
PMID: 30141111 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-018-0656-9.
Booth K, Beattie R, McBride M, Manoharan G, Spence M, Jones J Ulster Med J. 2016; 85(1):18-22.
PMID: 27158160 PMC: 4847840.
Attia R, Hickey G, Grant S, Bridgewater B, Roxburgh J, Kumar P Innovations (Phila). 2016; 11(1):15-23.
PMID: 26926521 PMC: 4791314. DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000236.