» Articles » PMID: 21342376

Efficacy and Safety of Androgen Deprivation Therapy After Switching from Monthly Leuprolide to Monthly Degarelix in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Feb 24
PMID 21342376
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether switching prostate cancer (PCa) patients from leuprolide to degarelix is associated with any change in the efficacy of testosterone suppression or safety profile during the first 3 months.

Methods: Participants were 134 patients with histologically confirmed PCa who had completed 1 year of treatment with leuprolide 7.5 mg monthly before being switched to degarelix. These patients were re-randomised for the extension trial to receive a starting dose of 240 mg degarelix followed by monthly maintenance doses of either 80 (n = 69) or 160 mg (n = 65). For efficacy assessment, serum testosterone, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels measured at days 3, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 assessed whether treatment efficacy is sustained. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, electrocardiograms and clinically significant changes in laboratory safety parameters.

Results: Serum testosterone, LH, and PSA levels were all sustained in both treatment arms during the observation period. Interestingly, FSH levels were further decreased by 30% following the switch to degarelix. With the exception of injection site reactions, the overall prevalence and pattern of AEs during the first 3 months after the switch was comparable to that during the last 3 months leuprolide treatment in the main trial. There were five (4%) patients discontinued to treatment-related AEs including injection site pain (n = 3) and fatigue (n = 2).

Conclusions: This 3-month analysis indicates that patients with prostate cancer can be safely switched from leuprolide to degarelix treatment with sustained efficacy as measured by biochemical markers.

Citing Articles

GnRH Antagonist: a New and an Effective Way of Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Tomabal B, Raghunath S, Srivatsa N, Nagaraj V Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022; 8(3):385-388.

PMID: 36118411 PMC: 9478057. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0611-4.


Real-World Evidence Prediction of a Phase IV Oncology Trial: Comparative Degarelix vs Leuprolide Safety.

Merola D, Schneeweiss S, Sreedhara S, Zabotka L, Quinto K, Concato J JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022; .

PMID: 35947646 PMC: 9403105. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac049.


Switching from a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to a GnRH antagonist in prostate cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Atchia K, Wallis C, Fleshner N, Toren P Can Urol Assoc J. 2019; 14(2):36-41.

PMID: 31348745 PMC: 7012296. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5996.


Clinical Effect of Switching from a Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonist to an Antagonist in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Serum Testosterone Level ≥ 20 ng/dl.

Soga N, Kageyama T, Ogura Y, Yamada T, Hayashi N Curr Urol. 2016; 9(1):31-5.

PMID: 26989369 PMC: 4789873. DOI: 10.1159/000442848.


Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists versus standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced prostate cancer A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Kunath F, Borgmann H, Blumle A, Keck B, Wullich B, Schmucker C BMJ Open. 2015; 5(11):e008217.

PMID: 26567252 PMC: 4654283. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008217.