» Articles » PMID: 21324248

The Quality of School Wellness Policies and Energy-balance Behaviors of Adolescent Mothers

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Feb 18
PMID 21324248
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we 1) compared the quality of school wellness policies among schools participating in Moms for a Healthy Balance (BALANCE), a school- and home-based weight loss study conducted with postpartum adolescents in 27 states; and 2) assessed the relationship between policy quality with energy-balance behaviors and body mass index z scores of postpartum adolescents.

Methods: As a part of BALANCE, we collected data on high-calorie food and beverage consumption, minutes spent walking, and height and weight for 647 participants. The School Wellness Policy Coding Tool was used to assess the strength and comprehensiveness of school district wellness policies from 251 schools attended by participating adolescent mothers.

Results: Schools averaged low scores for wellness policy comprehensiveness and strength. When compared with participants in schools with the lowest policy comprehensiveness scores, adolescent mothers in schools with the highest scores reported consuming significantly fewer daily calories from sweetened beverages while reporting higher consumption of water (P = .04 and P = .01, respectively). School wellness policy strength was associated with lower BMI z scores among adolescent mothers (P = .01).

Conclusion: School wellness policies associated with BALANCE may be limited in their ability to promote a healthy school environment. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effect of the strength and comprehensiveness of policy language on energy balance in high-risk postpartum adolescents. Evidence from this work can provide additional guidance to federal or state government in mandating not only policy content, but also systematic evaluation.

Citing Articles

Open Campus Policies: How Built, Food, Social, and Organizational Environments Matter for Oregon's Public High School Students' Health.

Budd E, Lievanos R, Amidon B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(2).

PMID: 31936808 PMC: 7013906. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020469.


Determinants and Interventions to Promote Water Consumption Among Adolescents: a Review of the Recent Literature.

Vezina-Im L, Beaulieu D Curr Nutr Rep. 2019; 8(2):129-144.

PMID: 31016465 DOI: 10.1007/s13668-019-0275-0.


Preventing Obesity Across Generations: Evidence for Early Life Intervention.

Haire-Joshu D, Tabak R Annu Rev Public Health. 2016; 37:253-71.

PMID: 26989828 PMC: 5305001. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021859.


School district wellness policy quality and weight-related outcomes among high school students in Minnesota.

Hoffman P, Davey C, Larson N, Grannon K, Hanson C, Nanney M Health Educ Res. 2016; 31(2):234-46.

PMID: 26850060 PMC: 4980870. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv101.


Postpartum Teens' Perception of the Food Environments at Home and School.

Tabak R, Joshu C, Clarke M, Schwarz C, Haire-Joshu D Health Educ Behav. 2015; 43(1):76-85.

PMID: 26272783 PMC: 5015643. DOI: 10.1177/1090198115596734.


References
1.
Gostin L . Law as a tool to facilitate healthier lifestyles and prevent obesity. JAMA. 2007; 297(1):87-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.1.87. View

2.
Haire-Joshu D, Elliott M, Caito N, Hessler K, Nanney M, Hale N . High 5 for Kids: the impact of a home visiting program on fruit and vegetable intake of parents and their preschool children. Prev Med. 2008; 47(1):77-82. PMC: 3607447. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.016. View

3.
Metos J, Nanney M . The strength of school wellness policies: one state's experience. J Sch Health. 2007; 77(7):367-72. PMC: 3268363. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00221.x. View

4.
Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P, Ventura S, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S . Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006; 55(1):1-101. View

5.
Ohlin A, Rossner S . Trends in eating patterns, physical activity and socio-demographic factors in relation to postpartum body weight development. Br J Nutr. 1994; 71(4):457-70. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19940155. View