Peasgood T, Howell M, Raghunandan R, Salisbury A, Sellars M, Chen G
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023; 42(2):177-198.
PMID: 37945778
PMC: 10811160.
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01327-x.
Richards K, Woolrych I, Allen K, Schmidt U
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):788.
PMID: 35715780
PMC: 9206284.
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08170-4.
Petrou S
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022; 20(1):10.
PMID: 35241102
PMC: 8896090.
DOI: 10.1186/s12962-022-00345-4.
Baker R, Mason H, McHugh N, Donaldson C
Soc Sci Med. 2021; 277:113892.
PMID: 33882440
PMC: 8135121.
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113892.
Nicolet A, van Asselt A, Vermeulen K, Krabbe P
PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0235666.
PMID: 32645035
PMC: 7347112.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235666.
Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.
Bahrampour M, Byrnes J, Norman R, Scuffham P, Downes M
Eur J Health Econ. 2020; 21(7):983-992.
PMID: 32367379
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01189-6.
How averse are the UK general public to inequalities in health between socioeconomic groups? A systematic review.
McNamara S, Holmes J, Stevely A, Tsuchiya A
Eur J Health Econ. 2019; 21(2):275-285.
PMID: 31650439
PMC: 7072057.
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01126-2.
Using discrete choice model to elicit preference for health-care priority setting.
Jouyani Y, Hadiyan M, Salehi M, Souri A
J Educ Health Promot. 2019; 8:117.
PMID: 31334269
PMC: 6615128.
DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_404_18.
What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.
Trapero-Bertran M, Rodriguez-Martin B, Lopez-Bastida J
PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219905.
PMID: 31318926
PMC: 6639002.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219905.
E-learning and health inequality aversion: A questionnaire experiment.
Cookson R, Ali S, Tsuchiya A, Asaria M
Health Econ. 2018; 27(11):1754-1771.
PMID: 30033581
PMC: 6221064.
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3799.
The views of the general public on prioritising vaccination programmes against childhood diseases: A qualitative study.
Lasseter G, Al-Janabi H, Trotter C, Carroll F, Christensen H
PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0197374.
PMID: 29897894
PMC: 5999095.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197374.
Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach.
Round J, Paulden M
Eur J Health Econ. 2017; 19(4):489-498.
PMID: 28573333
PMC: 5913380.
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0897-3.
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software.
Lancsar E, Fiebig D, Hole A
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017; 35(7):697-716.
PMID: 28374325
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
How important is severity for the evaluation of health services: new evidence using the relative social willingness to pay instrument.
Richardson J, Iezzi A, Maxwell A
Eur J Health Econ. 2016; 18(6):671-683.
PMID: 27456337
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0817-y.
Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy.
Whitty J, Ratcliffe J, Kendall E, Burton P, Wilson A, Littlejohns P
BMJ Open. 2015; 5(10):e008919.
PMID: 26474940
PMC: 4611181.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008919.
Comparison of Modes of Administration and Alternative Formats for Eliciting Societal Preferences for Burden of Illness.
Rowen D, Brazier J, Keetharuth A, Tsuchiya A, Mukuria C
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015; 14(1):89-104.
PMID: 26445967
PMC: 4740557.
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-015-0197-y.
Unchained melody: revisiting the estimation of SF-6D values.
Craig B
Eur J Health Econ. 2015; 17(7):865-73.
PMID: 26359242
PMC: 4786460.
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0727-4.
Valuing QALYs in Relation to Equity Considerations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
van de Wetering L, van Exel J, Bobinac A, Brouwer W
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015; 33(12):1289-300.
PMID: 26232199
PMC: 4661217.
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0311-x.
Can adult weights be used to value child health states? Testing the influence of perspective in valuing EQ-5D-Y.
Kind P, Klose K, Gusi N, Olivares P, Greiner W
Qual Life Res. 2015; 24(10):2519-39.
PMID: 25894060
PMC: 4564451.
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0971-1.
Are some QALYs more equal than others?.
van de Wetering E, van Exel N, Rose J, Hoefman R, Brouwer W
Eur J Health Econ. 2014; 17(2):117-27.
PMID: 25479937
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0657-6.