» Articles » PMID: 21306310

Centralized Treatment of Advanced Stages of Ovarian Cancer Improves Survival: a Nationwide Danish Survey

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2011 Feb 11
PMID 21306310
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This retrospective, nationwide, observational study was designed to compare treatment in tertiary referral centers vs. regional hospitals on overall survival for patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer.

Material And Methods: The study took place in all gynecological departments in Denmark, involving a total of 1,160 patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. Data were extracted for 2,024 patients with all stages of ovarian cancer recorded in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2008. The main outcome measure was overall survival.

Results: No difference was found between tertiary centers and regional hospitals with regard to age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score or comorbidity. Patients in regional hospitals had poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, i.e.1.0 vs. 2.0 (p= 0.005). Patients in referral centers presented more often with stage IIIC and IV disease, i.e. 59.7 vs. 51.7% (p < 0.001). Patients with stage IIIC and IV disease in regional vs. tertiary hospitals had a higher rate of primary cytoreductive surgery, i.e. 89.5 vs. 82.5% (p= 0.004), a poorer rate of complete cytoreductive surgery following primary cytoreductive surgery, i.e. 13.9 vs. 25.2% (p < 0.001), a lower rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, i.e. 5.5 vs. 13.4% (p < 0.001), and more often underwent acute surgery, i.e. 17.0 vs. 9.2% (p < 0.001). Patients treated in referral centers had better overall survival (p= 0.021). Treatment in a referral center was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival hazard ratio, 0.83 (confidence interval 0.70-0.98).

Conclusion: Patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer benefit from treatment in a tertiary referral center.

Citing Articles

Regionalizing ovarian cancer cytoreduction to high-volume centers and the impact on patient travel in New York State.

Kahn R, Ma X, Gordhandas S, Yeoshoua E, Ellis R, Zhang X Gynecol Oncol. 2024; 182:141-147.

PMID: 38262237 PMC: 10960664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.004.


Evaluation of perioperative management of advanced ovarian (tubal/peritoneal) cancer patients: a survey from MITO-MaNGO Groups.

Greggi S, Falcone F, Aletti G, Cascella M, Bifulco F, Colombo N J Gynecol Oncol. 2022; 33(5):e60.

PMID: 35712972 PMC: 9428297. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e60.


Incidence and survival of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, peritoneal, and undesignated abdominal/pelvic cancers in Sweden 1960-2014: A population-based cohort study.

Leandersson P, Hogberg T, Dickman P, Malander S, Borgfeldt C BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1):465.

PMID: 33902507 PMC: 8077696. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08169-w.


Adherence to French and ESGO Quality Indicators in Ovarian Cancer Surgery: An Ad-Hoc Analysis from the Prospective Multicentric CURSOC Study.

Alejandra M, Gertych W, Pomel C, Ferron G, Lusque A, Angeles M Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 33808284 PMC: 8037412. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071593.


Risk factors for early death among ovarian cancer patients: a nationwide cohort study.

Mosgaard B, Meaidi A, Hogdall C, Noer M J Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 31(3):e30.

PMID: 32026656 PMC: 7189078. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e30.