» Articles » PMID: 21305377

Adaptation to Constant-magnitude Assistive Forces: Kinematic and Neural Correlates

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Feb 10
PMID 21305377
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In many robot-assisted rehabilitation and motor skill learning applications, robots generate forces that facilitate movement performance. While there is some evidence that assistance is beneficial, the underlying mechanisms of action are largely unknown, and it is unclear what force patterns are more effective. Here, we investigate how reaching movements (and their neural correlates) are altered by 'assistive' forces. Subjects performed center-out reaching movements, under the influence of a robot-generated force, constant in magnitude and always directed toward the target. The experimental protocol included three phases: (1) baseline (no forces), (2) force field (with two different force levels, 3 N and 6 N, applied in random order), and (3) after-effect (no forces). EEG activity was recorded from motor and frontal cortical areas. In both movement kinematics and EEG activity, we looked at the effects of forces, of adaptation to such forces and at the aftereffects of such adaptation. Assistive forces initially induced a degraded performance and in general alterations in movement kinematics. However, subjects quickly adapted to the perturbation by improving their performance. With regard to EEG activity, we found (1) an increased beta band synchronization just before movements and an alpha band synchronization in the ipsilateral hemisphere, both proportional to force magnitude; (2) a gradual decrease in alpha band synchronization with practice in the contralateral hemisphere; (3) an increase in theta band synchronization in the later stage of the force epochs; and (4) an ipsilateral to contralateral shift (from baseline to aftereffect) of theta band synchronization. These results point to the need for a careful design of assistive forces to effectively facilitate motor performance and motor learning. Moreover, EEG signals exhibit distinct features related to force and adaptation. Therefore, at least in principle, the latter might be used to monitor the learning process and/or to regulate the amount of assistance.

Citing Articles

Transient Electromyographic Responses by Isokinetic Torque Release during Mechanically Assisted Elbow Flexion.

Choi J, YeapLoh P, Muraki S J Hum Kinet. 2024; 90:17-28.

PMID: 38380302 PMC: 10875692. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/169368.


Quantifying motor adaptation in a sport-specific table tennis setting.

Carius D, Kaminski E, Clauss M, Schewe Y, Ryk L, Ragert P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):601.

PMID: 38182640 PMC: 10770152. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50927-2.


Electrocortical activity correlated with locomotor adaptation during split-belt treadmill walking.

Jacobsen N, Ferris D J Physiol. 2023; 601(17):3921-3944.

PMID: 37522890 PMC: 10528133. DOI: 10.1113/JP284505.


The level of performance stabilization influences motor adaptation on an isometric force control task.

Santos S, Benda R, Couto C, Campos C, Andrade A, Lage G PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0185939.

PMID: 29073273 PMC: 5657626. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185939.


Ipsilateral EEG mu rhythm reflects the excitability of uncrossed pathways projecting to shoulder muscles.

Hasegawa K, Kasuga S, Takasaki K, Mizuno K, Liu M, Ushiba J J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):85.

PMID: 28841920 PMC: 5574148. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0294-2.


References
1.
Klimesch W . EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 29(2-3):169-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3. View

2.
Slobounov S, Johnston J, Chiang H, Ray W . Movement-related EEG potentials are force or end-effector dependent: evidence from a multi-finger experiment. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113(7):1125-35. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00123-2. View

3.
Pfurtscheller G, Zalaudek K, Neuper C . Event-related beta synchronization after wrist, finger and thumb movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 109(2):154-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00070-2. View

4.
Reinkensmeyer D, Patton J . Can robots help the learning of skilled actions?. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008; 37(1):43-51. PMC: 2905644. DOI: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181912108. View

5.
Gordon J, Ghilardi M, Cooper S, Ghez C . Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res. 1994; 99(1):112-30. DOI: 10.1007/BF00241416. View