» Articles » PMID: 21303786

The Selfing Syndrome: a Model for Studying the Genetic and Evolutionary Basis of Morphological Adaptation in Plants

Overview
Journal Ann Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Feb 10
PMID 21303786
Citations 116
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In angiosperm evolution, autogamously selfing lineages have been derived from outbreeding ancestors multiple times, and this transition is regarded as one of the most common evolutionary tendencies in flowering plants. In most cases, it is accompanied by a characteristic set of morphological and functional changes to the flowers, together termed the selfing syndrome. Two major areas that have changed during evolution of the selfing syndrome are sex allocation to male vs. female function and flower morphology, in particular flower (mainly petal) size and the distance between anthers and stigma.

Scope: A rich body of theoretical, taxonomic, ecological and genetic studies have addressed the evolutionary modification of these two trait complexes during or after the transition to selfing. Here, we review our current knowledge about the genetics and evolution of the selfing syndrome.

Conclusions: We argue that because of its frequent parallel evolution, the selfing syndrome represents an ideal model for addressing basic questions about morphological evolution and adaptation in flowering plants, but that realizing this potential will require the molecular identification of more of the causal genes underlying relevant trait variation.

Citing Articles

Effects of mode of reproduction on genetic polymorphism and divergence in wild yams (Dioscoreaceae: ).

Wang X, Feng Q, Zeng Z, Zhang Z, Cai J, Chen G Plant Divers. 2025; 47(1):136-147.

PMID: 40041563 PMC: 11873583. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2024.09.009.


2024: the year in review.

Barrett S Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20250065.

PMID: 39876739 PMC: 11775596. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0065.


Pollination ecotypes and the origin of plant species.

Johnson S Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20242787.

PMID: 39876736 PMC: 11775599. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2787.


Pollination efficiency and the evolution of sex allocation - diminishing returns matter.

Harder L, Johnson S New Phytol. 2025; 246(1):39-46.

PMID: 39853708 PMC: 11883055. DOI: 10.1111/nph.20389.


Mating systems and recombination landscape strongly shape genetic diversity and selection in wheat relatives.

Burgarella C, Bremaud M, Von Hirschheydt G, Viader V, Ardisson M, Santoni S Evol Lett. 2024; 8(6):866-880.

PMID: 39677571 PMC: 11637685. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrae039.


References
1.
Takebayashi N, Wolf D, Delph L . Effect of variation in herkogamy on outcrossing within a population of Gilia achilleifolia. Heredity (Edinb). 2005; 96(2):159-65. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800780. View

2.
Charlesworth B . Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Am Nat. 2009; 140(1):126-48. DOI: 10.1086/285406. View

3.
Sargent R, Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Ree R . Phylogenetic evidence for a flower size and number trade-off. Am J Bot. 2011; 94(12):2059-62. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.12.2059. View

4.
Goodwillie C . Wind pollination and reproductive assurance in Linanthus parviflorus (Polemoniaceae), a self-incompatible annual. Am J Bot. 1999; 86(7):948-54. View

5.
Mazer S, Dudley L, Delesalle V, Paz H, Galusky P . Stability of pollen-ovule ratios in pollinator-dependent versus autogamous Clarkia sister taxa: testing evolutionary predictions. New Phytol. 2009; 183(3):630-648. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02886.x. View