» Articles » PMID: 21301325

D-amphetamine, Nicotine, and Haloperidol Produce Similar Disruptions in Spatial and Nonspatial Temporal Discrimination Procedures

Overview
Journal Behav Pharmacol
Date 2011 Feb 9
PMID 21301325
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two different and generally noncomplimentary disruptions of timing by pharmacological agents have been found. One is a lateral shift of the psychophysical curve for time, indicating a subjective shortening or lengthening of time, whereas the other is a flattening of the curve and decrease in temporal accuracy. This study assessed the role of a methodological variation in producing this discrepancy. The procedure used required pigeons to classify stimulus duration intervals as short or long, using response alternatives that were defined either by the location of response keys (spatial), or by their color (nonspatial). D-amphetamine was used to replicate earlier findings, whereas nicotine and haloperidol extended the research to different drug classes. Dose-dependent decreases in the accuracy of classifying temporal intervals and a flattening of the psychophysical curve were found across drug classes for both spatial and nonspatial procedural variations. Procedural variations, under these conditions, could not explain the discrepancy. However, the results from this study added to the mounting body of literature showing decrements in temporal accuracy and a flattening of the psychophysical curve because of a number of diverse pharmacological and nonpharmacological disruptors.

Citing Articles

Enhancing translation: A need to leverage complex preclinical models of addictive drugs to accelerate substance use treatment options.

Corley C, Craig A, Sadek S, Marusich J, Chehimi S, White A Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2024; 243():173836.

PMID: 39067531 PMC: 11344688. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2024.173836.


Subjective and Real Time: Coding Under Different Drug States.

Sanchez-Castillo H, Taylor K, Ward R, Paz-Trejo D, Arroyo-Araujo M, Castillo O Int J Comp Psychol. 2016; 28.

PMID: 27087743 PMC: 4833012.


Revisiting the effect of nicotine on interval timing.

Daniels C, Watterson E, Garcia R, Mazur G, Brackney R, Sanabria F Behav Brain Res. 2015; 283:238-50.

PMID: 25637907 PMC: 4351175. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.027.

References
1.
Koek W, Slangen J . Effects of d-amphetamine and morphine on delayed discrimination: signal detection analysis and assessment of response repetition in the performance deficits. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984; 83(4):346-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF00428543. View

2.
Ward R, Odum A . Disruption of temporal discrimination and the choose-short effect. Learn Behav. 2007; 35(1):60-70. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196075. View

3.
Santi A, Coppa R, Ross L . Effects of the dopamine D2 agonist, quinpirole, on time and number processing in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001; 68(1):147-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00452-4. View

4.
Buhusi C, Meck W . Differential effects of methamphetamine and haloperidol on the control of an internal clock. Behav Neurosci. 2002; 116(2):291-7. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.2.291. View

5.
Fetterman J, Killeen P, Hall S . Watching the clock. Behav Processes. 2009; 44(2):211-224. PMC: 2729517. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(98)00050-3. View