» Articles » PMID: 21297929

Trends in Inpatient Setting Laminectomy for Excision of Herniated Intervertebral Disc: Population-based Estimates from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Overview
Journal Surg Neurol Int
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Feb 8
PMID 21297929
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Herniated intervertebral discs can result in pain and neurological compromise. Treatment for this condition is categorized as surgical or non-surgical. We sought to identify trends in inpatient surgical management of herniated intervertebral discs using a national database.

Methods: Patient discharges identified with a principal procedure relating to laminectomy for excision of herniated intervertebral disc were selected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD), under the auspices of a data user agreement. These surgical patients did not undergo instrumented fusion. To account for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample weighting schema, design-adjusted analyses were used. The estimates of standard errors were calculated using SUDAAN software (Research Triangle International, NC, USA). This software is based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM); a uniform and standardized coding system.

Results: Using International Classification of Disease 9(th) Revision clinical modifier (ICD-9 CM) procedure code 80.51, we were able to identify disc excision, in part or whole, by laminotomy or hemilaminectomy. The incidence of laminectomy for the excision of herniated intervertebral disc has decreased dramatically from 1993 where 266,152 cases were reported [CI = 22,342]. In 2007, only 123,398 cases were identified [CI = 12,438]. The average length of stay in 1993 was 4 days [CI = 0.17], and in 2007 it decreased to just 2 days [CI = 0.17]. Both these comparisons were significantly different at P < 0.001. The average inflation adjusted (2007 buying power) charge of the procedure in 1993 was 14,790.87 USD [CI = 916.85]. This value rose in 2007 to 24,639 USD [CI = 1,485.51]. This difference was significant at P < 0.001.

Conclusions: National estimates indicate that the incidence of inpatient laminectomy for the excision of herniated intervertebral disc has decreased significantly. This trend is multifactorial and is likely related to developments in outcomes research, the growing popularity of alternative procedures (intervertebral instrumented fusion), and transition to an ambulatory setting of surgical care.

Citing Articles

Database analysis comparing incidence and complication rates between inpatient and outpatient laminotomies for lumbar disc herniation.

Heo K, Bonsu J, Khawaja S, Karzon A, Rajan P, Barber L N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 18:100328.

PMID: 38966040 PMC: 11222817. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100328.


Association of HSS score and mechanical alignment after primary TKA of patients suffering from constitutional varus knee that caused by combined deformities: a retrospective study.

Zhang Z, Chai W, Zhao G, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Wang X Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3130.

PMID: 33542300 PMC: 7862289. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81285-6.


Second opinion in spine surgery: a Brazilian perspective.

Vialle E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 25 Suppl 1:S3-6.

PMID: 25947932 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1640-3.


Arthroplasty Utilization in the United States is Predicted by Age-Specific Population Groups.

Bashinskaya B, Zimmerman R, Walcott B, Antoci V ISRN Orthop. 2013; 2012.

PMID: 23505612 PMC: 3597125. DOI: 10.5402/2012/185938.


Conflict of interest in spine research reporting.

Walcott B, Sheth S, Nahed B, Coumans J PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e44327.

PMID: 22952956 PMC: 3432133. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044327.


References
1.
Gray D, Deyo R, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Heagerty P, Comstock B . Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(17):1957-63. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229148.63418.c1. View

2.
Deyo R, Gray D, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin B . United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(12):1441-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a. View

3.
Zhang Y, Guo T, Guo X, Wu S . Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain. Int J Biol Sci. 2009; 5(7):647-58. PMC: 2764347. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5.647. View

4.
Freburger J, Holmes G, Agans R, Jackman A, Darter J, Wallace A . The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(3):251-8. PMC: 4339077. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543. View

5.
Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednanik J, Smrcka V, Krbec M, Stejskal L . Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(20):2205-10; discussion 2210-1. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000029255.77224.BB. View