» Articles » PMID: 21289449

Patellofemoral Joint Forces and Stress During Forward Step-up, Lateral Step-up, and Forward Step-down Exercises

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Feb 4
PMID 21289449
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study using a repeated-measures design.

Objective: To quantify patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF) and stress (PFJS) during forward step-up (FSU), lateral step-up (LSU), and forward step-down (FSD) exercises.

Background: Although FSU, LSU, and FSD exercises are commonly used in patellofemoral joint rehabilitation programs, the influence of these stepping tasks on patellofemoral joint kinetics has not been quantified.

Methods: Three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics and kinetics and electromyographic (EMG) data were obtained from 20 healthy adults during their performance of FSU, LSU, and FSD exercises. The step height for each participant was adjusted to permit a standardized knee flexion angle of 45°. A previously described biomechanical model of the patellofemoral joint was used to quantify PFJRF and PFJS during each task. Peak PFJRF and PFJS during the concentric and eccentric phases of each step task were compared using a 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: When collapsed across concentric and eccentric phases, peak PFJS was significantly greater during the FSD (mean ± SD, 13.8 ± 0.4 MPa) compared to the LSU (11.5 ± 0.8 MPa; P<.001) and FSU (11.2 ± 0.6 MPa; P = .002) exercises. Peak PFJRF also was significantly greater during the FSD (51.1 ± 2.7 N/kg) compared to the LSU (44.1 ± 3.4 N/kg; P<.001) and FSU (43.6 ± 2.3 N/kg; P = .023) exercises.

Conclusion: In selecting exercises that promote lower extremity muscle strengthening while minimizing patellofemoral joint loading, LSU and FSU should be considered over FSD exercises, if the same step height is used.

Citing Articles

A kinetic analysis of four high velocity, horizontally focused step-up variations for acceleration training.

Glassbrook D, Dorman C, Doyle T, Wade J, Fuller J Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(8):1086-1094.

PMID: 38886980 PMC: 11295083. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12150.


Clinical value of questionnaires & physical tests for patellofemoral pain: Validity, reliability and predictive capacity.

Chamorro-Moriana G, Espuny-Ruiz F, Ridao-Fernandez C, Magni E PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0302215.

PMID: 38630735 PMC: 11023591. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302215.


The non-invasive evaluation technique of patellofemoral joint stress: a systematic literature review.

Wang B, Mao Z, Guo J, Yang J, Zhang S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1197014.

PMID: 37456733 PMC: 10343958. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1197014.


Patellofemoral Joint Loading Progression Across 35 Weightbearing Rehabilitation Exercises and Activities of Daily Living.

Song K, Scattone Silva R, Hullfish T, Silbernagel K, Baxter J Am J Sports Med. 2023; 51(8):2110-2119.

PMID: 37272685 PMC: 10315869. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231175160.


Evidence for Reliability and Validity of Functional Performance Testing in the Evaluation of Nonarthritic Hip Pain.

McGovern R, Christoforetti J, Martin R, Phelps A, Kivlan B J Athl Train. 2019; 54(3):276-282.

PMID: 30829535 PMC: 6485845. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-33-18.