» Articles » PMID: 21287210

Risk of Chipping or Facings Failure of Metal Ceramic Fixed Partial Prostheses--a Retrospective Data Record Analysis

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Feb 3
PMID 21287210
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This retrospective study investigated the frequency and time history of chipping or facings failure of three-unit and four-unit tooth-supported metal ceramic (MC) fixed partial prostheses (FPDs). Six hundred fifty-four MC FPDs were inserted according to a standardized treatment protocol at the Department of Prosthodontics of the Regensburg University Medical Center between 1984 and 2009. Frequency and time history of chipping or facings failure as well as possible risk factors were evaluated on the basis of historical clinical data. We estimated the survival times of FPDs by means of the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The 5-year survival rate (time to renewal of a FPD) of all MC FPDs was 94%; the 10-year survival rate was 87%. Twenty-eight (4.3%) MC FPDs showed chipping; the 5-year free-of-event rate of chipping was 95%, the 10-year rate was 94%. Possible risk factors had no statistically significant influence on chipping or facings failure. The annual hazard rate of MC chipping in the first year was 0.03, i.e., 3 out of 100 person-years of exposure showed chipping. The annual hazard rates for the next 6 years dropped to 0.009, 0.003, 0.007, 0.004, 0.005, and 0.007. Thus, about 3-9 out of 1,000 person-years of exposure showed chipping. Patients with MC FPD may expect a long survival rate of their restoration. During the first year, the risk of chipping may be higher than during the following years. Despite the long period of experience with MC FPDs, chipping of the facing will still occur.

Citing Articles

Success rate of all-ceramic FPDs depending on the time of restoration between 2011 and 2023.

Pott P, Eisenburger M, Stiesch M J Adv Prosthodont. 2024; 16(5):267-277.

PMID: 39512878 PMC: 11538893. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.267.


Evaluation of Biomechanical Stability of Teeth Tissue According to Crown Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Yoon Y, Lee M, Kang I, Oh S Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(13).

PMID: 37445067 PMC: 10342765. DOI: 10.3390/ma16134756.


Technical complications with tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) of different span lengths: an up to 15-year retrospective study.

Alenezi A, Aloqayli S BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):393.

PMID: 37316922 PMC: 10268423. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03121-9.


Retrospective Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fixed Dental Prostheses in Matched Groups of Bruxer and Nonbruxer Patients.

Hawthan M, Chrcanovic B, Larsson C Int J Dent. 2022; 2022:6818170.

PMID: 35386548 PMC: 8977310. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6818170.

References
1.
Napankangas R, Raustia A . Longevity of fixed metal ceramic bridge prostheses: a clinical follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(2):140-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00833.x. View

2.
Tan K, Pjetursson B, Lang N, Chan E . A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15(6):654-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01119.x. View

3.
Walter M, Reppel P, Boning K, Freesmeyer W . Six-year follow-up of titanium and high-gold porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26(2):91-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00373.x. View

4.
Swain M . Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5(5):1668-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.016. View

5.
De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L, De Boever J . A 20-year retrospective survival study of fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19(2):143-53. View