» Articles » PMID: 21286346

Rebleeding Rates Following TIPS for Variceal Hemorrhage in the Viatorr Era: TIPS Alone Versus TIPS with Variceal Embolization

Overview
Journal Hepatol Int
Publisher Springer
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2011 Feb 3
PMID 21286346
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare rebleeding rates following treatment of variceal hemorrhage with TIPS alone versus TIPS with variceal embolization in the covered stent-graft era.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 52 patients (M:F 29:23, median age 52 years) with hepatic cirrhosis and variceal hemorrhage underwent TIPS insertion between 2003 and 2008. Median Child-Pugh and MELD scores were 8.5 and 13.5. Generally, 10-mm diameter TIPS were created using covered stent-grafts (Viatorr; W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). A total of 37 patients underwent TIPS alone, while 15 patients underwent TIPS with variceal embolization. The rates of rebleeding and survival were compared.

Results: All TIPS were technically successful. Median portosystemic pressure gradient reductions were 13 versus 11 mmHg in the embolization and non-embolization groups. There were no statistically significant differences in Child-Pugh and MELD score, or portosystemic pressure gradients between each group. A trend toward increased rebleeding was present in the non-embolization group, where 8/37 (21.6%) patients rebled while 1/15 (6.7%) patients in the TIPS with embolization group rebled (P = 0.159) during median follow-up periods of 199 and 252 days (P = 0.374). Rebleeding approached statistical significance among patients with acute hemorrhage, where 8/32 (25%) versus 0/14 (0%) rebled in the non-embolization and embolization groups (P = 0.055). A trend toward increased bleeding-related mortality was seen in the non-embolization group (P = 0.120).

Conclusions: TIPS alone showed a high incidence of rebleeding in this series, whereas TIPS with variceal embolization resulted in reduced recurrent hemorrhage. The efficacy of embolization during TIPS performed for variceal hemorrhage versus TIPS alone should be further compared with larger prospective randomized trials.

Citing Articles

Comparison of specialized stent versus generic stent and bare stent combination for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation.

Bai Y, Liu J, Wang C, Yao W, Ju S, Wang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14439.

PMID: 38910214 PMC: 11194257. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64358-0.


Afferent vein embolization via retrograde approach as a potential treatment strategy for bleeding duodenal varices.

Jogo A, Yamamoto A, Kageyama K, Sasaki F, Oura T, Mitsuyama Y Radiol Case Rep. 2023; 18(12):4327-4330.

PMID: 37789920 PMC: 10542599. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.08.096.


Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt With or Without Gastroesophageal Variceal Embolization for the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jaber F, Beran A, Alsakarneh S, Ahmed K, Abdallah M, Elfert K Gastroenterology Res. 2023; 16(2):68-78.

PMID: 37187555 PMC: 10181335. DOI: 10.14740/gr1618.


Comparative outcome of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with or without variceal obliteration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Giri S, Patel R, Varghese J, Agarwal D, Tripathy T Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 48(4):1429-1437.

PMID: 36821005 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03843-y.


[Current Interventional Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding].

Yang L Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022; 53(3):361-366.

PMID: 35642139 PMC: 10409413. DOI: 10.12182/20220560206.


References
1.
Ter Borg P, Hollemans M, van Buuren H, Vleggaar F, Groeneweg M, Hop W . Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: long-term patency and clinical results in a patient cohort observed for 3-9 years. Radiology. 2004; 231(2):537-45. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2312021797. View

2.
Sahagun G, Benner K, Saxon R, Barton R, Rabkin J, Keller F . Outcome of 100 patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997; 92(9):1444-52. View

3.
Boyer T . Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of complications of portal hypertension. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008; 10(1):30-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-008-0006-y. View

4.
Charon J, Alaeddin F, Pimpalwar S, Fay D, Olliff S, Jackson R . Results of a retrospective multicenter trial of the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004; 15(11):1219-30. DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000137434.19522.E5. View

5.
Kessler J, Trerotola S . Use of the Amplatzer Vascular Plug for embolization of a large retroperitoneal shunt during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for gastric variceal bleeding. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17(1):135-40. DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000186958.59457.10. View