» Articles » PMID: 21286228

Frequency of Abdominal Wall Hernias: is Classical Teaching out of Date?

Overview
Journal JRSM Short Rep
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Feb 3
PMID 21286228
Citations 96
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Abdominal wall hernias are common. Various authors all quote the following order (in decreasing frequency): inguinal, femoral, umbilical followed by rarer forms. But are these figures outdated? We investigated the epidemiology of hernia repair (retrospective review) over 30 years to determine whether the relative frequencies of hernias are evolving.

Design: All hernia repairs undertaken in consecutive adult patients were assessed. Data included: patient demographics; hernia type; and operation details. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS.

Setting: A SINGLE UNITED KINGDOM HOSPITAL TRUST DURING THREE PERIODS: 1985-1988; 1995-1998; and 2005-2008.

Main Outcome Measures: Frequency data of different hernia types during three time periods, patient demographic data.

Results: Over the three time periods, 2389 patients underwent 2510 hernia repairs (i.e. including bilateral and multiple hernias in a single patient). Inguinal hernia repair was universally the commonest hernia repair, followed by umbilical, epigastric, para-umbilical, incisional and femoral, respectively. Whereas femoral hernia repair was the second commonest in the 1980s, it had become the fifth most common by 2005-2008. While the proportion of groin hernia repairs has decreased over time, the proportion of midline abdominal wall hernias has increased.

Conclusion: THE CURRENT RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF DIFFERENT HERNIA REPAIR TYPE IS: inguinal; umbilical; epigastric; incisional; para-umbilical; femoral; and finally other types e.g. spigelian. This contrasts with hernia incidence figures quoted in common reference books.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of abdominal herniation and its associations among patients operated in a Sudanese tertiary hospital: a retrospective review.

Bakry A, Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed K, Eljack M, Ahmed G BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):3.

PMID: 39755596 PMC: 11699653. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02741-4.


Risk of Gastrointestinal Diseases in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Nationwide, Register-Based Cohort Study.

Anderesen C, Al-Najami I, Liu W, Orwoll E, Folkestad L Calcif Tissue Int. 2025; 116(1):15.

PMID: 39751887 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-024-01311-3.


Prospective, observational study of intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with defect closure versus SCOLA for primary ventral hernia.

Deshpande G, Tirpude B, Bhanarkar H, Akulwar V, Kodape G, Gajbhiye R J Minim Access Surg. 2024; 20(4):397-402.

PMID: 39730131 PMC: 11601959. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_223_23.


Comparison of Postoperative Short-term Complications and Recurrence after One Year between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein Tension Free Repair on the Treatment of Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.

Ashrafi A, Kabiri A, Shayesteh Zadeh B, Sadri P World J Plast Surg. 2024; 13(3):87-91.

PMID: 39665011 PMC: 11629757. DOI: 10.61186/wjps.13.3.87.


A single-center retrospective review of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Baginski B, Tran D, Ogola G, Arnold D Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024; 37(6):897-902.

PMID: 39440074 PMC: 11492716. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2398981.


References
1.
Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K . Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003; 362(9395):1561-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0. View

2.
Primatesta P, Goldacre M . Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25(4):835-9. DOI: 10.1093/ije/25.4.835. View

3.
MacFadyen Jr , MATHIS . Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: Complications and Recurrences. Semin Laparosc Surg. 1994; 1(2):128-140. DOI: 10.1053/SLAS00100128. View

4.
Geer E, Shen W . Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balance. Gend Med. 2009; 6 Suppl 1:60-75. PMC: 2908522. DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2009.02.002. View

5.
Shi H, Clegg D . Sex differences in the regulation of body weight. Physiol Behav. 2009; 97(2):199-204. PMC: 4507503. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.017. View