» Articles » PMID: 21274418

Intracellular Distribution-based Anticancer Drug Targeting: Exploiting a Lysosomal Acidification Defect Associated with Cancer Cells

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2011 Jan 29
PMID 21274418
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The therapeutic usefulness of anticancer agents relies on their ability to exert maximal toxicity to cancer cells and minimal toxicity to normal cells. The difference between these two parameters defines the therapeutic index of the agent. Towards this end, much research has focused on the design of anticancer agents that have optimized potency against a variety of cancer cell types; however, much less effort is spent on the design of drugs that are minimally toxic to normal cells. We have previously described a concept for a novel drug delivery platform that relies on the propensity of drugs with optimal physicochemical properties to distribute differently in normal versus cancer cells due to differences in intracellular pH gradients. Specifically, we demonstrated in vitro that certain weakly basic anticancer agents had the propensity to distribute to intracellular locations in normal cells that prevent interaction with the drug target, and to intracellular locations in cancer cells that promote drug-target interactions. We refer to this concept broadly as intracellular distribution-based drug targeting. Here we will discuss current in vivo work from our laboratory that examined the role of lysosome pH on the intracellular distribution and toxicity of inhibitors of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone in mice.

Citing Articles

A Novel Substituted Benzo[]quinoxaline-Based Cyclometalated Ru(II) Complex as a Biocompatible Membrane-Targeted PDT Colon Cancer Stem Cell Agent.

Marco A, Kasparkova J, Bautista D, Kostrhunova H, Cutillas N, Markova L J Med Chem. 2024; 67(23):21470-21485.

PMID: 39620973 PMC: 11647881. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02357.


Oleanolic Acid's Semisynthetic Derivatives HIMOXOL and Br-HIMOLID Show Proautophagic Potential and Inhibit Migration of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro.

Lisiak N, Lewicka I, Kaczmarek M, Kujawski J, Bednarczyk-Cwynar B, Zaprutko L Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(20).

PMID: 34681931 PMC: 8538366. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011273.


Drug Sequestration in Lysosomes as One of the Mechanisms of Chemoresistance of Cancer Cells and the Possibilities of Its Inhibition.

Hrabeta J, Belhajova M, Subrtova H, Rodrigo M, Heger Z, Eckschlager T Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(12).

PMID: 32575682 PMC: 7352242. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124392.


Identification of hepatic phospholipidosis inducers in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes, a physiologically relevant model, reveals altered basolateral uptake and biliary excretion of anionic probe substrates.

Ferslew B, Brouwer K Toxicol Sci. 2014; 139(1):99-107.

PMID: 24563379 PMC: 4038789. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu033.


Proton-shuttling lichen compound usnic acid affects mitochondrial and lysosomal function in cancer cells.

Bessadottir M, Egilsson M, Einarsdottir E, Magnusdottir I, Ogmundsdottir M, Omarsdottir S PLoS One. 2012; 7(12):e51296.

PMID: 23227259 PMC: 3515546. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051296.


References
1.
Nitiss J, Wang J . DNA topoisomerase-targeting antitumor drugs can be studied in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85(20):7501-5. PMC: 282219. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.20.7501. View

2.
Ndolo R, Forrest M, Krise J . The role of lysosomes in limiting drug toxicity in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010; 333(1):120-8. PMC: 2846018. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.160226. View

3.
Christensen K, Myers J, Swanson J . pH-dependent regulation of lysosomal calcium in macrophages. J Cell Sci. 2002; 115(Pt 3):599-607. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115.3.599. View

4.
Hurley L . DNA and its associated processes as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2(3):188-200. DOI: 10.1038/nrc749. View

5.
Lansiaux A, Tanious F, Mishal Z, Dassonneville L, Kumar A, Stephens C . Distribution of furamidine analogues in tumor cells: targeting of the nucleus or mitochondria depending on the amidine substitution. Cancer Res. 2002; 62(24):7219-29. View