» Articles » PMID: 21270022

The Evolution of Island Gigantism and Body Size Variation in Tortoises and Turtles

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Jan 29
PMID 21270022
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Extant chelonians (turtles and tortoises) span almost four orders of magnitude of body size, including the startling examples of gigantism seen in the tortoises of the Galapagos and Seychelles islands. However, the evolutionary determinants of size diversity in chelonians are poorly understood. We present a comparative analysis of body size evolution in turtles and tortoises within a phylogenetic framework. Our results reveal a pronounced relationship between habitat and optimal body size in chelonians. We found strong evidence for separate, larger optimal body sizes for sea turtles and island tortoises, the latter showing support for the rule of island gigantism in non-mammalian amniotes. Optimal sizes for freshwater and mainland terrestrial turtles are similar and smaller, although the range of body size variation in these forms is qualitatively greater. The greater number of potential niches in freshwater and terrestrial environments may mean that body size relationships are more complicated in these habitats.

Citing Articles

Shell Constraints on Evolutionary Body Size-Limb Size Allometry Can Explain Morphological Conservatism in the Turtle Body Plan.

Hermanson G, Evers S Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70504.

PMID: 39539674 PMC: 11557996. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70504.


Shell biomechanics suggests an aquatic palaeoecology at the dawn of turtle evolution.

Ferreira G, Hermanson G, Kyriakouli C, Drozdz D, Szczygielski T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21822.

PMID: 39294199 PMC: 11411134. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72540-7.


Evolutionary shift detection with ensemble variable selection.

Zhang W, Kenney T, Ho L BMC Ecol Evol. 2024; 24(1):11.

PMID: 38245667 PMC: 10800078. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02201-w.


Turtle body size evolution is determined by lineage-specific specializations rather than global trends.

Farina B, Godoy P, Benson R, Langer M, Ferreira G Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(6):e10201.

PMID: 37384241 PMC: 10293707. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10201.


The molecular evolution of genes previously associated with large sizes reveals possible pathways to cetacean gigantism.

Silva F, Souza E, Ramos E, Freitas L, Nery M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):67.

PMID: 36658131 PMC: 9852289. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24529-3.


References
1.
Thomson R, Shaffer H . Sparse supermatrices for phylogenetic inference: taxonomy, alignment, rogue taxa, and the phylogeny of living turtles. Syst Biol. 2010; 59(1):42-58. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp075. View

2.
Butler M, King A . Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution. Am Nat. 2018; 164(6):683-695. DOI: 10.1086/426002. View

3.
Drummond A, Rambaut A . BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007; 7:214. PMC: 2247476. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214. View

4.
Jacobs D, Lindberg D . Oxygen and evolutionary patterns in the sea: onshore/offshore trends and recent recruitment of deep-sea faunas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 95:9396-401. PMC: 21349. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9396. View

5.
Near T, Meylan P, Shaffer H . Assessing concordance of fossil calibration points in molecular clock studies: an example using turtles. Am Nat. 2005; 165(2):137-46. DOI: 10.1086/427734. View