» Articles » PMID: 21267342

Rubella Screening and Immunization: Its History and Future-an Ongoing Challenge

Overview
Date 2011 Jan 27
PMID 21267342
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) continues to be a serious threat to the unborn child, since a significant number of women of childbearing age are susceptible to rubella. Vaccines and immunization programs, since their inception, have given us a false sense of security in our assumption that they have provided adequate protection. The ultimate purpose of immunization is the eradication of CRS; but to achieve this, an understanding of the evolution of vaccines and immunization programs is essential, in order to provide appropriate immunization today.This paper provides a review of rubella vaccines; immunization programs; current recommendations for screening and immunization; and the report of a five-year surveillance study of women of childbearing age, which found 17% of the subjects to be susceptible to rubella.

References
1.
Horstmann D . Controlling rubella: problems and perspectives. Ann Intern Med. 1975; 83(3):412-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-83-3-412. View

2.
Coulombe L, Rosser W . Can we prevent an increase in the incidence of congenital rubella syndrome in the next decade?. Can Med Assoc J. 1981; 125(1):37-40. PMC: 1862589. View

3.
OShea S, Best J, Banatvala J, Marshall W, DUDGEON J . Rubella vaccination: persistence of antibodies for up to 16 years. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982; 285(6337):253-5. PMC: 1499591. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.285.6337.253. View

4.
Chappell J, Taylor M . Implications of rubella susceptibility in young adults. Am J Public Health. 1979; 69(3):279-81. PMC: 1619093. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.69.3.279. View

5.
Howard J, Kahn A . Rubella immunization policies for health care personnel. J Fam Pract. 1983; 17(5):805-7. View