Automatic Processing Influences Free Recall: Converging Evidence from the Process Dissociation Procedure and Remember-know Judgments
Overview
Affiliations
Dual-process theories of retrieval suggest that controlled and automatic processing contribute to memory performance. Free recall tests are often considered pure measures of recollection, assessing only the controlled process. We report two experiments demonstrating that automatic processes also influence free recall. Experiment 1 used inclusion and exclusion tasks to estimate recollection and automaticity in free recall, adopting a new variant of the process dissociation procedure. Dividing attention during study selectively reduced the recollection estimate but did not affect the automatic component. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1, and subjects additionally reported remember-know-guess judgments during recall in the inclusion condition. In the latter task, dividing attention during study reduced remember judgments for studied items, but know responses were unaffected. Results from both methods indicated that free recall is partly driven by automatic processes. Thus, we conclude that retrieval in free recall tests is not driven solely by conscious recollection (or remembering) but also by automatic influences of the same sort believed to drive priming on implicit memory tests. Sometimes items come to mind without volition in free recall.
Neuroscientist's Behavioral Toolbox for Studying Episodic-Like Memory.
Kuncicka D, Krajcovic B, Stuchlik A, Brozka H eNeuro. 2024; 11(8).
PMID: 39214694 PMC: 11366770. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0073-24.2024.
Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.
Garlitch S, Richmond L, Ball B, Wahlheim C Memory. 2022; 31(2):218-233.
PMID: 36308518 PMC: 9992089. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2139846.
Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.
Ozubko J, Sirianni L, Ahmad F, MacLeod C, Addante R Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021; 21(1):119-143.
PMID: 33409957 PMC: 7994187. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00854-w.
Nie A, Ke C, Li M, Guo B Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020; 15(4):276-289.
PMID: 32494313 PMC: 7251628. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0275-1.
Sharifian N, Kraal A, Zaheed A, Sol K, Zahodne L Dev Psychol. 2019; 55(11):2464-2473.
PMID: 31436459 PMC: 6813874. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000805.