» Articles » PMID: 21258515

Effect of Temporal Location of Correction of Monochromatic Aberrations on the Dynamic Accommodation Response

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Jan 25
PMID 21258515
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dynamic correction of monochromatic aberrations of the eye is known to affect the accommodation response to a step change in stimulus vergence. We used an adaptive optics system to determine how the temporal location of the correction affects the response. The system consists of a Shack-Hartmann sensor sampling at 20 Hz and a 37-actuator piezoelectric deformable mirror. An extra sensing channel allows for an independent measure of the accommodation level of the eye. The accommodation response of four subjects was measured during a +/- 0.5 D step change in stimulus vergence whilst aberrations were corrected at various time locations. We found that continued correction of aberrations after the step change decreased the gain for disaccommodation, but increased the gain for accommodation. These results could be explained based on the initial lag of accommodation to the stimulus and changes in the level of aberrations before and after the stimulus step change. Future considerations for investigations of the effect of monochromatic aberrations on the dynamic accommodation response are discussed.

Citing Articles

Adaptive optics visual simulators: a review of recent optical designs and applications [Invited].

Marcos S, Artal P, Atchison D, Hampson K, Legras R, Lundstrom L Biomed Opt Express. 2023; 13(12):6508-6532.

PMID: 36589577 PMC: 9774875. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.473458.


There is more to accommodation of the eye than simply minimizing retinal blur.

Marin-Franch I, Del Aguila-Carrasco A, Bernal-Molina P, Esteve-Taboada J, Lopez-Gil N, Montes-Mico R Biomed Opt Express. 2017; 8(10):4717-4728.

PMID: 29082097 PMC: 5654812. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.8.004717.


Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Marcos S, Werner J, Burns S, Merigan W, Artal P, Atchison D Vision Res. 2017; 132:3-33.

PMID: 28212982 PMC: 5437977. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.006.


Potential role for microfluctuations as a temporal directional cue to accommodation.

Metlapally S, Tong J, Tahir H, Schor C J Vis. 2016; 16(6):19.

PMID: 27120075 PMC: 4900136. DOI: 10.1167/16.6.19.


Dynamics of the near response under natural viewing conditions with an open-view sensor.

Chirre E, Prieto P, Artal P Biomed Opt Express. 2015; 6(10):4200-11.

PMID: 26504666 PMC: 4605075. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.6.004200.


References
1.
Cheng H, Barnett J, Vilupuru A, Marsack J, Kasthurirangan S, Applegate R . A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. J Vis. 2004; 4(4):272-80. DOI: 10.1167/4.4.3. View

2.
Schor C, Bharadwaj S . Pulse-step models of control strategies for dynamic ocular accommodation and disaccommodation. Vision Res. 2005; 46(1-2):242-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.030. View

3.
Rocha K, Vabre L, Chateau N, Krueger R . Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(11):1885-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.059. View

4.
Bharadwaj S, Vedamurthy I, Schor C . Short-term adaptive modification of dynamic ocular accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50(7):3520-8. PMC: 2714044. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2577. View

5.
Mucke S, Manahilov V, Strang N, Seidel D, Gray L . New type of perceptual suppression during dynamic ocular accommodation. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(13):R555-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.037. View