» Articles » PMID: 21258320

Cell-type-specific Replication Initiation Programs Set Fragility of the FRA3B Fragile Site

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2011 Jan 25
PMID 21258320
Citations 250
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Common fragile sites have long been identified by cytogeneticists as chromosomal regions prone to breakage upon replication stress. They are increasingly recognized to be preferential targets for oncogene-induced DNA damage in pre-neoplastic lesions and hotspots for chromosomal rearrangements in various cancers. Common fragile site instability was attributed to the fact that they contain sequences prone to form secondary structures that may impair replication fork movement, possibly leading to fork collapse resulting in DNA breaks. Here we show, in contrast to this view, that the fragility of FRA3B--the most active common fragile site in human lymphocytes--does not rely on fork slowing or stalling but on a paucity of initiation events. Indeed, in lymphoblastoid cells, but not in fibroblasts, initiation events are excluded from a FRA3B core extending approximately 700 kilobases, which forces forks coming from flanking regions to cover long distances in order to complete replication. We also show that origins of the flanking regions fire in mid-S phase, leaving the site incompletely replicated upon fork slowing. Notably, FRA3B instability is specific to cells showing this particular initiation pattern. The fact that both origin setting and replication timing are highly plastic in mammalian cells explains the tissue specificity of common fragile site instability we observed. Thus, we propose that common fragile sites correspond to the latest initiation-poor regions to complete replication in a given cell type. For historical reasons, common fragile sites have been essentially mapped in lymphocytes. Therefore, common fragile site contribution to chromosomal rearrangements in tumours should be reassessed after mapping fragile sites in the cell type from which each tumour originates.

Citing Articles

Replication stress induces POLQ-mediated structural variant formation throughout common fragile sites after entry into mitosis.

Wilson T, Ahmed S, Winningham A, Glover T Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9582.

PMID: 39505880 PMC: 11541566. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53917-8.


Innovative Tools for DNA Topology Probing in Human Cells Reveal a Build-Up of Positive Supercoils Following Replication Stress at Telomeres and at the FRA3B Fragile Site.

Ghilain C, Vidal-Cruchez O, Joly A, Debatisse M, Gilson E, Giraud-Panis M Cells. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39195250 PMC: 11352870. DOI: 10.3390/cells13161361.


Replication fork stalling in late S-phase elicits nascent strand degradation by DNA mismatch repair.

Colicino-Murbach E, Hathaway C, Dungrawala H Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(18):10999-11013.

PMID: 39180395 PMC: 11472054. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae721.


A post-irradiation-induced replication stress promotes RET proto-oncogene breakage.

Hecht F, Valerio L, Goncalves C, Harinquet M, Ameziane El Hassani R, Carvalho D Eur Thyroid J. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 39047147 PMC: 11378124. DOI: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0028.


DNA replication in early mammalian embryos is patterned, predisposing lamina-associated regions to fragility.

Xu S, Wang N, Zuccaro M, Gerhardt J, Iyyappan R, Scatolin G Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5247.

PMID: 38898078 PMC: 11187207. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49565-7.


References
1.
Tsantoulis P, Kotsinas A, Sfikakis P, Evangelou K, Sideridou M, Levy B . Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study. Oncogene. 2007; 27(23):3256-64. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210989. View

2.
Rothstein R, Michel B, Gangloff S . Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev. 2000; 14(1):1-10. View

3.
Cha R, Kleckner N . ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science. 2002; 297(5581):602-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1071398. View

4.
Negrini S, Gorgoulis V, Halazonetis T . Genomic instability--an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11(3):220-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2858. View

5.
Farkash-Amar S, Lipson D, Polten A, Goren A, Helmstetter C, Yakhini Z . Global organization of replication time zones of the mouse genome. Genome Res. 2008; 18(10):1562-70. PMC: 2556267. DOI: 10.1101/gr.079566.108. View