» Articles » PMID: 21253374

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Epidural Anesthesia: a Clinical Feasibility Study

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2011 Jan 22
PMID 21253374
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has traditionally been performed under general anesthesia, however, owing in part to the advancement of surgical and anesthetic techniques, many laparoscopic cholecystectomies have been successfully performed under the spinal anesthetic technique. We hoped to determine the feasibility of segmental epidural anesthesia for LC.

Methods: Twelve American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II patients received an epidural block for LC. The level of epidural block and the satisfaction score of patients and the surgeon were checked to evaluate the efficacy of epidural block for LC.

Results: LC was performed successfully under epidural block, with the exception of 1 patient who required a conversion to general anesthesia owing to severe referred pain. There were no special postoperative complications, with the exception of one case of urinary retention.

Conclusions: Epidural anesthesia might be applicable for LC. However, the incidence of intraoperative referred shoulder pain is high, and so careful patient recruitment and management of shoulder pain should be considered.

Citing Articles

Awake laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case report and review of literature.

Mazzone C, Sofia M, Sarva I, Litrico G, Di Stefano A, La Greca G World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(13):3002-3009.

PMID: 37215416 PMC: 10198068. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i13.3002.


Comparison of the Effects of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia with General Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Changes and its Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Azad Majedi M, Sarlak S, Sadeghi Y, Ahsan B Adv Biomed Res. 2019; 8:7.

PMID: 30820428 PMC: 6385560. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_193_18.


Comparative study of mid-thoracic spinal versus epidural anesthesia for open nephrectomy in patients with obstructive/restrictive lung disease: A randomized controlled study.

Seif N, Elbadawy A Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13(1):52-59.

PMID: 30692889 PMC: 6329241. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_415_18.


A Comparative Study between Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Fentanyl to Relieve Shoulder Pain during Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trail.

Asgari Z, Tavoli Z, Hosseini R, Nataj M, Tabatabaei F, Dehghanizadeh F Pain Res Manag. 2018; 2018:9715142.

PMID: 29743962 PMC: 5878866. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9715142.


Comparison of the effects of spinal epidural and general anesthesia on coagulation and fibrinolysis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial: VSJ Competition, 2 place.

Demiryas S, Donmez T, Erdem V, Erdem D, Hatipoglu E, Ferahman S Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017; 12(3):330-340.

PMID: 29062459 PMC: 5649509. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.70249.


References
1.
Scawn N, Pennefather S, Soorae A, Wang J, Russell G . Ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy with epidural analgesia: the influence of phrenic nerve infiltration with lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2001; 93(2):260-4, 1st contents page. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00004. View

2.
Sinha R, Gurwara A, Gupta S . Laparoscopic surgery using spinal anesthesia. JSLS. 2008; 12(2):133-8. PMC: 3016173. View

3.
Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S, Stamatiou G, Hatzitheofilou C . Spinal vs general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2008; 143(5):497-501. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.497. View

4.
Pursnani K, Bazza Y, Calleja M, Mughal M . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(8):1082-4. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900785. View

5.
Lal P, Philips P, Saxena K, Kajla R, Chander J, Ramteke V . Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair under epidural anesthesia: a detailed evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2006; 21(4):595-601. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9050-6. View