» Articles » PMID: 21248591

A Cochrane Review of Combined Chiropractic Interventions for Low-back Pain

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Jan 21
PMID 21248591
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: To determine the effects of combined chiropractic interventions on pain, disability, back-related function, overall improvement, and patient satisfaction in adults with low-back pain (LBP).

Summary Of Background Data: Chiropractors commonly use a combination of interventions to treat people with LBP, but little is known about the effects of this care.

Methods: We used a comprehensive search strategy. All randomized trials comparing combined chiropractic interventions (rather than spinal manipulation alone) with no treatment or other therapies were included. At least two authors selected studies, assessed bias risk, and extracted data. Descriptive synthesis and meta-analyses were performed.

Results: We included 12 studies involving 2887 LBP participants. Three studies had low risk of bias. Included studies evaluated a range of chiropractic procedures in a variety of subpopulations with LBP. For acute and subacute LBP, chiropractic interventions improved short- and medium-term pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.25 [95% CI: -0.46 to -0.04] and MD -0.89 [95%CI: -1.60 to -0.18]) compared with other treatments, but there was no significant difference in long-term pain (MD -0.46 [95% CI -1.18 to 0.26]). Short-term improvement in disability was greater in the chiropractic group compared to other therapies (SMD -0.36 [95% CI: -0.70 to -0.02]). However, the effect was small and studies contributing to these results had high risk of bias. There was no difference in medium- and long-term disability. No difference was demonstrated for combined chiropractic interventions for chronic LBP and studies that had a mixed population of LBP.

Conclusion: Combined chiropractic interventions slightly improved pain and disability in the short term and pain in the medium term for acute/subacute LBP. However, there is currently no evidence that supports or refutes that these interventions provide a clinically meaningful difference for pain or disability in people with LBP when compared to other interventions.

Citing Articles

Tension-Type Headache Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Qin L, Song P, Li X, Yang L, Xu F, Zhu X Pain Ther. 2024; 13(4):691-717.

PMID: 38748200 PMC: 11254882. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00600-x.


Immediate Effects of Spinal Manipulative Therapy on the Performance of Elite Brazilian Soccer Players: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With an Internally Validated Sham Treatment.

Botelho M, Barbosa M, Junior C, Lara J, Moreira A, Baptista A J Chiropr Med. 2022; 21(4):270-279.

PMID: 36420360 PMC: 9676397. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.021.


Global Cluster Analysis and Network Visualization in Musculoskeletal Pain Management: A Scientometric Mapping.

Mei F, Li J, Li J, Dong S, Li Z, Xing D Orthop Surg. 2022; 15(1):301-314.

PMID: 36411536 PMC: 9837243. DOI: 10.1111/os.13564.


Management of people with low back pain: a survey of opinions and beliefs of Dutch and Belgian chiropractors.

De la Ruelle L, de Zoete A, de Boer M, Van Tulder M, Ostelo R, Rubinstein S Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):29.

PMID: 35725617 PMC: 9208165. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00437-1.


Presence of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha in Urine Samples of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Undergoing Chiropractic Care: Preliminary Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study.

Gevers-Montoro C, Romero-Santiago M, Losapio L, Conesa-Buendia F, Newell D, Alvarez-Galovich L Front Integr Neurosci. 2022; 16:879083.

PMID: 35492573 PMC: 9039288. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2022.879083.