» Articles » PMID: 21248331

Sodium Bentonite and Monensin Under Chronic Aflatoxicosis in Broiler Chickens

Overview
Journal Poult Sci
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2011 Jan 21
PMID 21248331
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clay feed additives have been increasingly incorporated into animal diets to prevent aflatoxicosis. Due to the nonselective nature of the binding interaction, many important components of the diets could also be made unavailable because of these feed additives. The anticoccidial monensin (MON) could also be sequestered by these clays. The use of sodium bentonite (Na-B) from a mine in the province of Mendoza, Argentina, was investigated as a sequestering agent to prevent the effects of 100 µg/kg of dietary aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)). In vitro studies demonstrated that the above Na-B was a good candidate to prevent aflatoxicosis. They also showed that MON competes with AFB(1) for the adsorption sites on the clay surface and effectively displaces the toxin when it is in low concentration. Even though the levels of MON in diets, approximately 55 mg/kg, are high enough to not be significantly changed as a consequence of the adsorption, they can further affect the ability of the clays to bind low levels of AFB(1). An in vivo experiment carried out with poultry showed that 100 µg/kg of AFB(1) does not significantly change productive or biochemical parameters. However, liver histopathology not only confirmed the ability of this particular Na-B to prevent aflatoxicosis but also the decrease of this capacity in the presence of 55 mg/kg of MON. This is the first report stressing this fact and further research should be performed to check if this behavior is a characteristic of the assayed Na-B or of this type of clay. On the other hand, the presence of MON should also be taken into account when assaying the potential AFB(1) binding ability of a given bentonite.

Citing Articles

Protective effects of feed additives on broiler chickens exposed to aflatoxins-contaminated feed: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Putra R, Astuti D, Respati A, Ningsih N, Triswanto , Yano A Vet Res Commun. 2023; 48(1):225-244.

PMID: 37644237 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-023-10199-7.


Evaluation of Effectiveness of a Novel Multicomponent Mycotoxins Detoxification Agent in the Presence of AFB1 and T-2 Toxin on Broiler Chicks.

Stefanovic D, Marinkovic D, Trailovic S, Vasiljevic M, Farkas H, Raj J Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36985148 PMC: 10051569. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11030574.


Invited review: Remediation strategies for mycotoxin control in feed.

Liu M, Zhao L, Gong G, Zhang L, Shi L, Dai J J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2022; 13(1):19.

PMID: 35090579 PMC: 8796454. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-021-00661-4.


studies on gastrointestinal monogastric and avian models to evaluate the binding efficacy of mycotoxin adsorbents by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Prapapanpong J, Udomkusonsri P, Mahavorasirikul W, Choochuay S, Tansakul N J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2019; 6(1):125-132.

PMID: 31453181 PMC: 6702928. DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f322.


Biomarkers for Exposure as A Tool for Efficacy Testing of A Mycotoxin Detoxifier in Broiler Chickens and Pigs.

Lauwers M, Croubels S, Letor B, Gougoulias C, Devreese M Toxins (Basel). 2019; 11(4).

PMID: 30925814 PMC: 6520943. DOI: 10.3390/toxins11040187.