» Articles » PMID: 21244667

Revisiting the Value of Pre-hospital Tracheal Intubation: an All Time Systematic Literature Review Extracting the Utstein Airway Core Variables

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2011 Jan 20
PMID 21244667
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Although tracheal intubation (TI) in the pre-hospital setting is regularly carried out by emergency medical service (EMS) providers throughout the world, its value is widely debated. Heterogeneity in procedures, providers, patients, systems and stated outcomes, and inconsistency in data reporting make scientific reports difficult to interpret and compare, and the majority are of limited quality. To hunt down what is really known about the value of pre-hospital TI, we determined the rate of reported Utstein airway variables (28 core variables and 12 fixed-system variables) found in current scientific publications on pre-hospital TI.

Methods: We performed an all time systematic search according to the PRISMA guidelines of Medline and EMBASE to identify original research pertaining to pre-hospital TI in adult patients.

Results: From 1,076 identified records, 73 original papers were selected. Information was extracted according to an Utstein template for data reporting from in-the-field advanced airway management. Fifty-nine studies were from North American EMS systems. Of these, 46 (78%) described services in which non-physicians conducted TI. In 12 of the 13 non-North American EMS systems, physicians performed the pre-hospital TI. Overall, two were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and 65 were observational studies. None of the studies presented the complete set of recommended Utstein airway variables. The median number of core variables reported was 10 (max 21, min 2, IQR 8-12), and the median number of fixed system variables was 5 (max 11, min 0, IQR 4-8). Among the most frequently reported variables were "patient category" and "service mission type", reported in 86% and 71% of the studies, respectively. Among the least-reported variables were "co-morbidity" and "type of available ventilator", both reported in 2% and 1% of the studies, respectively.

Conclusions: Core data required for proper interpretation of results were frequently not recorded and reported in studies investigating TI in adults. This makes it difficult to compare scientific reports, assess their validity, and extrapolate to other EMS systems. Pre-hospital TI is a complex intervention, and terminology and study design must be improved to substantiate future evidence based clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Intubation first-pass success in a high performing pre-hospital critical care system is not associated with 30-day mortality: a registry study of 4496 intubation attempts.

Ljungqvist H, Pirneskoski J, Saviluoto A, Setala P, Tommila M, Nurmi J Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022; 30(1):61.

PMID: 36411447 PMC: 9677625. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-022-01049-7.


Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia in trauma patients treated by anaesthesiologist and nurse anaesthetist staffed critical care teams.

Arnason B, Hertzberg D, Kornhall D, Gunther M, Gellerfors M Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021; 65(9):1329-1336.

PMID: 34152597 PMC: 9291089. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13946.


A comparison of airway management devices in simulated entrapment-trauma: a prospective manikin study.

Pap R, van Loggerenberg C Int J Emerg Med. 2019; 12(1):15.

PMID: 31286862 PMC: 6615147. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-019-0233-z.


Collecting core data in physician-staffed pre-hospital helicopter emergency medical services using a consensus-based template: international multicentre feasibility study in Finland and Norway.

Tonsager K, Rehn M, Ringdal K, Lossius H, Virkkunen I, Osteras O BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):151.

PMID: 30849977 PMC: 6408770. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3976-6.


Airway Management in the Emergency Department (The OcEAN-Study) - a prospective single centre observational cohort study.

Bernhard M, Bax S, Hartwig T, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Petros S, Bercker S Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27(1):20.

PMID: 30764832 PMC: 6376794. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-019-0599-1.


References
1.
Bushby N, Fitzgerald M, Cameron P, Marasco S, Bystrzycki A, Rosenfeld J . Prehospital intubation and chest decompression is associated with unexpected survival in major thoracic blunt trauma. Emerg Med Australas. 2005; 17(5-6):443-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00775.x. View

2.
Stiell I, Nesbitt L, Pickett W, Munkley D, Spaite D, Banek J . The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ. 2008; 178(9):1141-52. PMC: 2292763. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071154. View

3.
Wang H, Peitzman A, Cassidy L, Adelson P, Yealy D . Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and outcome after traumatic brain injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 44(5):439-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.04.008. View

4.
Ridgway S, Hodzovic I, Woollard M, Latto I . Prehospital airway management in Ambulance Services in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59(11):1091-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03965.x. View

5.
Stockinger Z, McSwain Jr N . Prehospital endotracheal intubation for trauma does not improve survival over bag-valve-mask ventilation. J Trauma. 2004; 56(3):531-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000111755.94642.29. View