» Articles » PMID: 21242389

Development of a Photographic Scale for Consistency and Guidance in Dermatologic Assessment of Forearm Sun Damage

Overview
Journal Arch Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2011 Jan 19
PMID 21242389
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To develop a photographic sun damage assessment scale for forearm skin and test its feasibility and utility for consistent classification of sun damage.

Design: For a blinded comparison, 96 standardized 8 × 10 digital photographs of participants' forearms were taken. Photographs were graded by an expert dermatologist using an existing 9-category dermatologic assessment scoring scale until all categories contained photographs representative of each of 4 clinical signs. Triplicate photographs were provided in identical image sets to 5 community dermatologists for blinded rating using the dermatologic assessment scoring scale.

Setting: Academic skin cancer prevention clinic with high-level experience in assessment of sun-damaged skin.

Participants: Volunteer sample including participants from screenings, chemoprevention, and/or biomarker studies.

Main Outcome Measures: Reproducibility and agreement of grading among dermatologists by Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the correlation of scores given for the same photograph, κ statistics for ordinal data, and variability of scoring among dermatologists, using analysis of variance models with evaluating physician and photographs as main effects and interaction effect variables to account for the difference in scoring among dermatologists.

Results: Correlations (73% to >90%) between dermatologists were all statistically significant (P < .001). Scores showed good to substantial agreement but were significantly different (P < .001) for each of 4 clinical signs and the difference varied significantly (P < .001) among photographs.

Conclusions: With good to substantial agreement, we found the development of a photographic forearm sun damage assessment scale highly feasible. In view of significantly different rating scores, a photographic reference for assessment of sun damage is also necessary.

Citing Articles

Tobacco smoking is associated with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma but not with basal cell carcinoma or melanoma in adult subjects at risk of skin cancer: A cross-sectional study.

Uotila I, Siiskonen H, Haimakainen S, Harvima I Tob Induc Dis. 2024; 22.

PMID: 38745594 PMC: 11091865. DOI: 10.18332/tid/185299.


Mapping cutaneous field carcinogenesis of nonmelanoma skin cancer using mesoscopic imaging of pro-inflammation cues.

Shugar A, Konger R, Rohan C, Travers J, Kim Y Exp Dermatol. 2024; 33(4):e15076.

PMID: 38610095 PMC: 11034840. DOI: 10.1111/exd.15076.


Association of Early Clinical Response to Laser Rejuvenation of Photoaged Skin with Increased Lipid Metabolism and Restoration of Skin Barrier Function.

Garza L, Sheu M, Kim N, Tsai J, Alessi Cesar S, Lee J J Invest Dermatol. 2022; 143(3):374-385.e7.

PMID: 36055399 PMC: 9971340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.07.024.


Inter- and Intra-physician variation in quantifying actinic keratosis skin photodamage.

Schmeusser B, Borchers C, Travers J, Borchers S, Trevino J, Rubin M J Clin Investig Dermatol. 2020; 8(2).

PMID: 33088904 PMC: 7575200.


Quantifying skin photodamage with spatial frequency domain imaging: statistical results.

Travers J, Poon C, Bihl T, Rinehart B, Borchers C, Rohrbach D Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(9):4676-4683.

PMID: 31565518 PMC: 6757479. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.004676.


References
1.
Griffiths C, Wang T, Hamilton T, Voorhees J, Ellis C . A photonumeric scale for the assessment of cutaneous photodamage. Arch Dermatol. 1992; 128(3):347-51. View

2.
Marks R, Edwards C . The measurement of photodamage. Br J Dermatol. 1992; 127 Suppl 41:7-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb16981.x. View

3.
Lever L, Kumar P, Marks R . Topical retinoic acid for treatment of solar damage. Br J Dermatol. 1990; 122(1):91-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1990.tb08244.x. View

4.
Weiss J, Ellis C, Goldfarb M, Voorhees J . Tretinoin therapy: practical aspects of evaluation and treatment. J Int Med Res. 1990; 18 Suppl 3:41C-48C. View

5.
Jakobsson U, Westergren A . Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005; 19(4):427-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00368.x. View