» Articles » PMID: 21238470

Eating Rate During a Fixed-portion Meal Does Not Affect Postprandial Appetite and Gut Peptides or Energy Intake During a Subsequent Meal

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2011 Jan 18
PMID 21238470
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eating rate has recently been shown to influence energy intake and appetite during an ad libitum meal, and alter postprandial secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide-YY (PYY) following a fixed-portion meal. Whether these effects influence satiety, as measured by energy intake at the subsequent meal, is unclear. We manipulated eating rate during a fixed-portion meal in order to examine how eating behavior and associated periprandial and postprandial responses of putative endocrine mediators of appetite would affect energy intake at the following meal in fifteen non-obese (BMI<25 kg/m²) and ten obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) healthy adult men and women. In random order, each participant consumed a standardized, fixed-portion meal in 7 (FM), 14 (MM) or 28 (SM) minutes. Fullness, measured by the Satiety Labeled Intensity Magnitude (SLIM) scale, serum insulin, glucose, leptin, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), PYY, GLP-1, neuropeptide-Y, and plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) were measured for 3h following the fixed-portion meal. Ad libitum energy intake at the next meal was then measured. Eating slowly delayed time to peak fullness (P ≤ 0.05), but did not alter peak fullness. Peak PP concentrations were attenuated during FM compared to MM and SM (P ≤ 0.05) and were reached earlier during MM compared to SM (P ≤ 0.05). A meal-by-time interaction (P ≤ 0.05), but no differences in AUC, peak, or time to peak were observed for CCK. No additional between meal differences in AUC, peak or time to peak for any endocrine mediator of appetite was observed. Ad libitum energy intake was not different between trials. In conclusion, the rate at which a fixed-portion meal is consumed does not appear to alter satiety despite a small effect on PP and CCK responses.

Citing Articles

Influence of oral processing behaviour and bolus properties of brown rice and chickpeas on in vitro starch digestion and postprandial glycaemic response.

Chen Y, Stieger M, Capuano E, Forde C, van der Haar S, Ummels M Eur J Nutr. 2022; 61(8):3961-3974.

PMID: 35773354 PMC: 9596526. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-022-02935-7.


How Important Is Eating Rate in the Physiological Response to Food Intake, Control of Body Weight, and Glycemia?.

Argyrakopoulou G, Simati S, Dimitriadis G, Kokkinos A Nutrients. 2020; 12(6).

PMID: 32532002 PMC: 7353031. DOI: 10.3390/nu12061734.


Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibition Increases Postprandial Norepinephrine via Substance P (NK1 Receptor) During RAAS Inhibition.

Wilson J, Kerman S, Hubers S, Yu C, Nian H, Grouzmann E J Endocr Soc. 2019; 3(10):1784-1798.

PMID: 31528826 PMC: 6734191. DOI: 10.1210/js.2019-00185.


Slow Down: Behavioural and Physiological Effects of Reducing Eating Rate.

Hawton K, Ferriday D, Rogers P, Toner P, Brooks J, Holly J Nutrients. 2018; 11(1).

PMID: 30591684 PMC: 6357517. DOI: 10.3390/nu11010050.


Appetite Suppression and Altered Food Preferences Coincide with Changes in Appetite-Mediating Hormones During Energy Deficit at High Altitude, But Are Not Affected by Protein Intake.

Karl J, Cole R, Berryman C, Finlayson G, Radcliffe P, Kominsky M High Alt Med Biol. 2018; 19(2):156-169.

PMID: 29431471 PMC: 6014054. DOI: 10.1089/ham.2017.0155.