» Articles » PMID: 21233341

Mechanisms of Gas Exchange Response to Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Severe Emphysema

Overview
Date 2011 Jan 15
PMID 21233341
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves lung function, respiratory symptoms, and exercise tolerance in selected patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who have heterogeneous emphysema. However, the reported effects of LVRS on gas exchange are variable, even when lung function is improved. To clarify how LVRS affects gas exchange in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 23 patients were studied before LVRS, 14 of whom were again studied afterwards. We performed measurements of lung mechanics, pulmonary hemodynamics, and ventilation-perfusion (Va/Q) inequality using the multiple inert-gas elimination technique. LVRS improved arterial Po₂ (Pa(O₂)) by a mean of 6 Torr (P = 0.04), with no significant effect on arterial Pco₂ (Pa(CO₂)), but with great variability in both. Lung mechanical properties improved considerably more than did gas exchange. Post-LVRS Pa(O₂) depended mostly on its pre-LVRS value, whereas improvement in Pa(O(2)) was explained mostly by improved Va/Q inequality, with lesser contributions from both increased ventilation and higher mixed venous Po(2). However, no index of lung mechanical properties correlated with Pa(O₂). Conversely, post-LVRS Pa(CO₂) bore no relationship to its pre-LVRS value, whereas changes in Pa(CO₂) were tightly related (r² = 0.96) to variables, reflecting decrease in static lung hyperinflation (intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure and residual volume/total lung capacity) and increase in airflow potential (tidal volume and maximal inspiratory pressure), but not to Va/Q distribution changes. Individual gas exchange responses to LVRS vary greatly, but can be explained by changes in combinations of determining variables that are different for oxygen and carbon dioxide.

Citing Articles

The effects of lung volume reduction treatment on diffusing capacity and gas exchange.

van Dijk M, Klooster K, Ten Hacken N, Sciurba F, Kerstjens H, Slebos D Eur Respir Rev. 2020; 29(158).

PMID: 33115787 PMC: 9488951. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0171-2019.


The complex care of severe emphysema: role of awake lung volume reduction surgery.

Pompeo E, Rogliani P, Palombi L, Orlandi A, Cristino B, Dauri M Ann Transl Med. 2015; 3(8):108.

PMID: 26046049 PMC: 4436426. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.04.17.


Several clinical interests regarding lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Huang W, Wang W, Deng B, Tan Y, Jiang G, Zhou H J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 6:148.

PMID: 22074613 PMC: 3226652. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-148.

References
1.
Wagner P, Dantzker D, Dueck R, Clausen J, West J . Ventilation-perfusion inequality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest. 1977; 59(2):203-16. PMC: 333349. DOI: 10.1172/JCI108630. View

2.
Fishman A, Martinez F, Naunheim K, Piantadosi S, Wise R, Ries A . A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(21):2059-73. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa030287. View

3.
. Rationale and design of The National Emphysema Treatment Trial: a prospective randomized trial of lung volume reduction surgery. The National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Chest. 1999; 116(6):1750-61. DOI: 10.1378/chest.116.6.1750. View

4.
Miller J, Malthaner R, Goldsmith C, Goeree R, Higgins D, Cox P . A randomized clinical trial of lung volume reduction surgery versus best medical care for patients with advanced emphysema: a two-year study from Canada. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 81(1):314-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.055. View

5.
Rossi A, Polese G, Brandi G, Conti G . Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi). Intensive Care Med. 1995; 21(6):522-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF01706208. View