» Articles » PMID: 21227967

Provisioning Offspring and Others: Risk-energy Trade-offs and Gender Differences in Hunter-gatherer Foraging Strategies

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Jan 14
PMID 21227967
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Offspring provisioning is commonly referenced as the most important influence on men's and women's foraging decisions. However, the provisioning of other adults may be equally important in determining gender differences in resource choice, particularly when the goals of provisioning offspring versus others cannot be met with the acquisition of the same resources. Here, we examine how resources vary in their expected daily energetic returns and in the variance or risk around those returns. We predict that when available resources impose no trade-off between risk and energy, the targets of men's and women's foraging will converge on high-energy, low-risk resources that allow for the simultaneous provisioning of offspring and others. However, when minimizing risk and maximizing energy trade-off with one another, we expect men's foraging to focus on provisioning others through the unreliable acquisition of large harvests, while women focus on reliably acquiring smaller harvests to feed offspring. We test these predictions with foraging data from three populations (Aché, Martu and Meriam). The results uphold the predictions, suggesting that men's and women's foraging interests converge when high-energy resources can be reliably acquired, but diverge when higher-energy resources are associated with higher levels of risk. Social factors, particularly the availability of alloparental support, may also play a major role.

Citing Articles

Extensive locomotor versatility across a global sample of hunter-gatherer societies.

Brill G, Mirazon-Lahr M, Dyble M Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20242553.

PMID: 39626750 PMC: 11614540. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2553.


Foreign-language effects in cross-cultural behavioral research: Evidence from the Tanzanian Hadza.

Stibbard-Hawkes D, Abarbanell L, Mabulla I, Endeko E, Legare C, Apicella C PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(6):pgae218.

PMID: 38915735 PMC: 11194998. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae218.


Women's subsistence networks scaffold cultural transmission among BaYaka foragers in the Congo Basin.

Jang H, Ross C, Boyette A, Janmaat K, Kandza V, Redhead D Sci Adv. 2024; 10(2):eadj2543.

PMID: 38198536 PMC: 10780863. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj2543.


Earliest known funerary rites in Wallacea after the last glacial maximum.

Hawkins S, Zetika G, Kinaston R, Firmando Y, Sari D, Suniarti Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):282.

PMID: 38168501 PMC: 10762057. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50294-y.


Biological constraints and socioecological influences on women's pursuit of risk and the sexual division of labour.

Starkweather K, Shenk M, McElreath R Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 2:e59.

PMID: 37588367 PMC: 10427445. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2020.60.


References
1.
Bird R, Codding B, Bird D . What Explains Differences in Men's and Women's Production? : Determinants of Gendered Foraging Inequalities among Martu. Hum Nat. 2014; 20(2):105-29. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-009-9061-9. View

2.
Bird R, Bird D . Why women hunt: risk and contemporary foraging in a Western Desert aboriginal community. Curr Anthropol. 2009; 49(4):655-93. View

3.
Gurven M, Hill K . Why do men hunt? A reevaluation of "man the hunter" and the sexual division of labor. Curr Anthropol. 2009; 50(1):51-62. DOI: 10.1086/595620. View

4.
von Rueden C, Gurven M, Kaplan H . Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1715):2223-32. PMC: 3107626. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2145. View

5.
Marlowe F, Berbesque J, Wood B, Crittenden A, Porter C, Mabulla A . Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution. J Hum Evol. 2014; 71:119-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.03.006. View