» Articles » PMID: 21221343

Episiotomy: Differences in Practice Between Family Physicians and Obstetricians

Overview
Date 2011 Jan 12
PMID 21221343
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A review of 2188 records compared the numbers and types of episiotomies and tears in low-risk women delivered by family physicians and obstetricians. Family physicians performed significantly fewer episiotomies and were more likely to rely on the mediolateral procedure; obstetricians varied episiotomy type more often. The rates of third-degree tears and intact perineum were very similar.

Citing Articles

Comparing obstetric practice patterns.

McMurray S Can Fam Physician. 1995; 41:1470, 1472.

PMID: 8520232 PMC: 2146688.


Family medicine in a tertiary care hospital. Obstetrical outcomes and interventions.

Gaspar D, Jordan J Can Fam Physician. 1995; 41:601-7.

PMID: 7787490 PMC: 2146519.

References
1.
Goodlin R . On protection of the maternal perineum during birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 62(3):393-4. DOI: 10.1097/00006250-198309000-00026. View

2.
BEYNON C . Midline episiotomy as a routine procedure. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974; 81(2):126-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00430.x. View

3.
Greenland S, Neutra R . Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. Int J Epidemiol. 1980; 9(4):361-7. DOI: 10.1093/ije/9.4.361. View

4.
Reid A, Carroll J, Ruderman J, Murray M . Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians. CMAJ. 1989; 140(6):625-33. PMC: 1268752. View

5.
Coats P, Chan K, Wilkins M, BEARD R . A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980; 87(5):408-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04569.x. View