» Articles » PMID: 21220325

Linking Functional Diversity and Social Actor Strategies in a Framework for Interdisciplinary Analysis of Nature's Benefits to Society

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2011 Jan 12
PMID 21220325
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The crucial role of biodiversity in the links between ecosystems and societies has been repeatedly highlighted both as source of wellbeing and as a target of human actions, but not all aspects of biodiversity are equally important to different ecosystem services. Similarly, different social actors have different perceptions of and access to ecosystem services, and therefore, they have different wants and capacities to select directly or indirectly for particular biodiversity and ecosystem characteristics. Their choices feed back onto the ecosystem services provided to all parties involved and in turn, affect future decisions. Despite this recognition, the research communities addressing biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human outcomes have yet to develop frameworks that adequately treat the multiple dimensions and interactions in the relationship. Here, we present an interdisciplinary framework for the analysis of relationships between functional diversity, ecosystem services, and human actions that is applicable to specific social environmental systems at local scales. We connect the mechanistic understanding of the ecological role of diversity with its social relevance: ecosystem services. The framework permits connections between functional diversity components and priorities of social actors using land use decisions and ecosystem services as the main links between these ecological and social components. We propose a matrix-based method that provides a transparent and flexible platform for quantifying and integrating social and ecological information and negotiating potentially conflicting land uses among multiple social actors. We illustrate the applicability of our framework by way of land use examples from temperate to subtropical South America, an area of rapid social and ecological change.

Citing Articles

Ecosystem Services Profiles for Communities Benefitting from Estuarine Habitats along the Massachusetts Coast, USA.

Yee S, Sharpe L, Branoff B, Jackson C, Cicchetti G, Jackson S Ecol Inform. 2024; 77:1-20.

PMID: 38487338 PMC: 10936571. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102182.


Genotype and phenotype data standardization, utilization and integration in the big data era for agricultural sciences.

Deng C, Naithani S, Kumari S, Cobo-Simon I, Quezada-Rodriguez E, Skrabisova M Database (Oxford). 2023; 2023.

PMID: 38079567 PMC: 10712715. DOI: 10.1093/database/baad088.


A conceptual approach to characterizing ecological suitability: Informing socio-ecological measures for restoration effectiveness.

Smith L, Reschke E, Bousquin J, Harvey J, Summers J Ecol Indic. 2022; 143:1-11.

PMID: 36504635 PMC: 9727737. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109385.


Diversity strengthens competing teams.

Rowlett J, Karlsson C, Nursultanov M R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(8):211916.

PMID: 35958087 PMC: 9363986. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211916.


Agricultural expansion and the ecological marginalization of forest-dependent people.

Levers C, Romero-Munoz A, Baumann M, De Marzo T, Fernandez P, Gasparri N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(44).

PMID: 34697233 PMC: 8612363. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100436118.


References
1.
Laliberte E, Wells J, DeClerck F, Metcalfe D, Catterall C, Queiroz C . Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. Ecol Lett. 2009; 13(1):76-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x. View

2.
Cowling R, Egoh B, T Knight A, OFarrell P, Reyers B, Rouget M . An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(28):9483-8. PMC: 2474485. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706559105. View

3.
Wardle D, Bardgett R, Klironomos J, Setala H, van der Putten W, Wall D . Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science. 2004; 304(5677):1629-33. DOI: 10.1126/science.1094875. View

4.
Zak M, Cabido M, Caceres D, Diaz S . What drives accelerated land cover change in central Argentina? Synergistic consequences of climatic, socioeconomic, and technological factors. Environ Manage. 2008; 42(2):181-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9101-y. View

5.
Jackson R, Jobbagy E, Avissar R, Roy S, Barrett D, Cook C . Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science. 2005; 310(5756):1944-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1119282. View