» Articles » PMID: 21210311

Grammont's Idea: The Story of Paul Grammont's Functional Surgery Concept and the Development of the Reverse Principle

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2011 Jan 7
PMID 21210311
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The increased use of the reverse prosthesis over the last 10 years is due to a large series of publications using the reverse prosthesis developed by Paul Grammont. However, there is no article reporting the story of the concepts developed by Grammont.

Questions/purposes: The purposes of this review are to describe the principles developed by Grammont, the chronology of development, and the biomechanical concepts and studies that led to the current design of the reverse prosthesis.

Methods: We selectively reviewed literature and provide personal observations.

Results: From phylogenetic observations, Grammont developed the principle of functional surgery applied to the rotator cuff tears. To increase the deltoid lever arm, he imagined two possibilities: the lateralization of the acromion, which facilitates the action of the rotator cuff, and the medialization of the center of rotation, which has been developed to respond to situations of rotator cuff deficiency. Grammont proposed the use of an acromiohumeral prosthesis, which was quickly abandoned due to problems of acromial loosening. Finally, Grammont used the principle of reverse prosthesis developed in the 1970s, but made a major change by medializing the center of rotation in a nonanatomic location. In 1985, Grammont validated the concept by an experimental study and the first model using a cemented sphere was implanted.

Conclusions: The development of the modern reverse prosthesis is the result of the intellectual and experimental work conducted by Grammont and his team for 20 years. Knowledge of this history is essential to envision future developments.

Citing Articles

Humeral Stem Design in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Lehman A, Su F, Feeley B Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024; 17(12):616-624.

PMID: 39627579 PMC: 11652425. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09931-w.


A unique tribological inverted bearing solution for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Vitamin E and ceramic (unique inverse pairings in rTSR).

Krishnan M, Rajaratnam J, Peiris D, Gupta M, Wigmore E, Heinrichs C Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241265627.

PMID: 39552659 PMC: 11562244. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241265627.


Lateralization and inclination angle in reverse arthroplasty-what do we know?.

Ekelund A, Poncet D Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241281910.

PMID: 39545010 PMC: 11559928. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241281910.


Development, Evolution, and Outcomes of More Anatomical Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Sanchez-Urgelles P, Kolakowski L, Levin J, Frankle M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518651 PMC: 11546102. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216513.


Does primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures show favourable functional outcomes over secondary treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty?.

Blaas L, Lameijer C, Alta T, Yuan J, van Dieren S, Bloemers F Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(5):559-568.

PMID: 39493403 PMC: 11528779. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231190038.


References
1.
Gagey O, Hue E . Mechanics of the deltoid muscle. A new approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (375):250-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200006000-00030. View

2.
Nyffeler R, Werner C, Gerber C . Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(5):524-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.010. View

3.
Kolbel R, FRIEDEBOLD G . [Shoulder joint replacement]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1973; 76(1):31-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00416651. View

4.
Fischer L, Carret J, Gonon G, Dimnet J . [Cinematic study of the movements of the scapulo-humeral (articulatio humeri) joint]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1977; 63 Suppl 2:108-15. View

5.
Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G . Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(8):1742-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00851. View