» Articles » PMID: 21206648

Laparoscopic Splenectomy Using Conventional Instruments

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2011 Jan 6
PMID 21206648
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is an accepted procedure for elective splenectomy. Advancement in technology has extended the possibility of LS in massive splenomegaly [Choy et al., J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(4), 197-200 (2004)], trauma [Ren et al., Surg Endosc 15(3), 324 (2001); Mostafa et al., Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(4), 283-286 (2002)], and cirrhosis with portal hypertension [Hashizume et al., Hepatogastroenterology 49(45), 847-852 (2002)]. In a developing country, these advanced gadgets may not be always available. We performed LS using conventional and reusable instruments in a public teaching the hospital without the use of the advanced technology. The technique of LS and the outcome in these patients is reported.

Materials And Methods: Patients undergoing LS for various hematological disorders from 1998 to 2004 were included. Electrocoagulation, clips, and intracorporeal knotting were the techniques used for tackling short-gastric vessels and splenic pedicle. Specimen was delivered through a Pfannensteil incision.

Results: A total of 26 patients underwent LS. Twenty-two (85%) of patients had spleen size more than 500 g (average weight being 942.55 g). Mean operative time was 214 min (45-390 min). The conversion rate was 11.5% (n = 3). Average duration of stay was 5.65 days (3-30 days). Accessory spleen was detected and successfully removed in two patients. One patient developed subphrenic abscess. There was no mortality. There was no recurrence of hematological disease.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic splenectomy using conventional equipment and instruments is safe and effective. Advanced technology has a definite advantage but is not a deterrent to the practice of LS.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic splenectomy for spontaneous rupture of the spleen.

Thapar P, Philip R, Masurkar V, Khadse P, Randive N J Minim Access Surg. 2016; 12(1):75-8.

PMID: 26917926 PMC: 4746982. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.158950.


The Role of Pre-emptive Control of Vascular Pedicle in Laparoscopic Splenectomy: An Experience with 19 Consecutive Patients.

Golash V Oman Med J. 2011; 26(2):136-40.

PMID: 22043402 PMC: 3191669. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2011.34.


Laparoscopic splenectomy using conventional instruments.

Doctor H J Minim Access Surg. 2010; 1(3):137.

PMID: 21188013 PMC: 3001172. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.19000.

References
1.
Park A, Gagner M, Pomp A . The lateral approach to laparoscopic splenectomy. Am J Surg. 1997; 173(2):126-30. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89602-X. View

2.
Wu J, Lai I, Yuan R, Yu S . Laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Surg. 2004; 187(6):720-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.032. View

3.
Gigot J, De Ville De Goyet J, Van Beers B, Reding R, Etienne J, Jadoul P . Laparoscopic splenectomy in adults and children: experience with 31 patients. Surgery. 1996; 119(4):384-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80136-x. View

4.
Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh R, Tarnoff M, Malm J, Ponsky J . Outcome of laparoscopic splenectomy based on hematologic indication. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(2):272-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8150-6. View

5.
Napoli A, Catalano C, Silecchia G, Fabiano P, Fraioli F, Pediconi F . Laparoscopic splenectomy: multi-detector row CT for preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 2004; 232(2):361-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322030445. View