» Articles » PMID: 21191483

Stochastic Threshold Microdose Model for Cell Killing by Insoluble Metallic Nanomaterial Particles

Overview
Journal Dose Response
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2010 Dec 31
PMID 21191483
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper introduces a novel microdosimetric model for metallic nanomaterial-particles (MENAP)-induced cytotoxicity. The focus is on the engineered insoluble MENAP which represent a significant breakthrough in the design and development of new products for consumers, industry, and medicine. Increased production is rapidly occurring and may cause currently unrecognized health effects (e.g., nervous system dysfunction, heart disease, cancer); thus, dose-response models for MENAP-induced biological effects are needed to facilitate health risk assessment. The stochasticthresholdmicrodose (STM) model presented introduces novel stochastic microdose metrics for use in constructing dose-response relationships for the frequency of specific cellular (e.g., cell killing, mutations, neoplastic transformation) or subcellular (e.g., mitochondria dysfunction) effects. A key metric is the exposure-time-dependent, specific burden (MENAP count) for a given critical target (e.g., mitochondria, nucleus). Exceeding a stochastic threshold specific burden triggers cell death. For critical targets in the cytoplasm, the autophagic mode of death is triggered. For the nuclear target, the apoptotic mode of death is triggered. Overall cell survival is evaluated for the indicated competing modes of death when both apply. The STM model can be applied to cytotoxicity data using Bayesian methods implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Citing Articles

Are some neurons hypersensitive to metallic nanoparticles?.

Scott B Dose Response. 2012; 10(1):37-57.

PMID: 22423227 PMC: 3299526. DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.10-006.Scott.

References
1.
Donaldson K, Stone V, Tran C, Kreyling W, Borm P . Nanotoxicology. Occup Environ Med. 2004; 61(9):727-8. PMC: 1763673. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.013243. View

2.
Powell M, Kanarek M . Nanomaterial health effects--Part 2: Uncertainties and recommendations for the future. WMJ. 2006; 105(3):18-23. View

3.
Scott B, Belinsky S, Leng S, Lin Y, Wilder J, Damiani L . Radiation-stimulated epigenetic reprogramming of adaptive-response genes in the lung: an evolutionary gift for mounting adaptive protection against lung cancer. Dose Response. 2009; 7(2):104-31. PMC: 2695570. DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.08-016.Scott. View

4.
Redpath J, Liang D, Taylor T, Christie C, Elmore E . The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiat Res. 2001; 156(6):700-7. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0700:tsotdr]2.0.co;2. View

5.
Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J . Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(7):823-39. PMC: 1257642. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7339. View