Kinetics of K(+) Occlusion by the Phosphoenzyme of the Na(+),K(+)-ATPase
Overview
Affiliations
Investigations of K(+)-occlusion by the phosphoenzyme of Na(+),K(+)-ATPase from shark rectal gland and pig kidney by stopped-flow fluorimetry reveal major differences in the kinetics of the two enzymes. In the case of the pig enzyme, a single K(+)-occlusion step could be resolved with a rate constant of 342 (± 26) s⁻¹. However, in the case of the shark enzyme, two consecutive K(+)-occlusions were detected with rate constants of 391 (± 19) s⁻¹ and 48 (± 2) s⁻¹ at 24°C and pH 7.4. A conformational change of the phosphoenzyme associated with K(+)-occlusion is, thus, the major rate-determining step of the shark enzyme under saturating concentrations of all substrates, whereas for the pig enzyme the major rate-determining step under the same conditions is the E2 → E1 transition and its associated K(+) deocclusion and release to the cytoplasm. The differences in rate constants of the K(+) occlusion reactions of the two enzymes are paralleled by compensating changes to the rate constant for the E2 → E1 transition, which explains why the differences in the enzymes' kinetic behaviors have not previously been identified.
Cholesterol depletion inhibits Na,K-ATPase activity in a near-native membrane environment.
Garcia A, Lev B, Hossain K, Gorman A, Diaz D, Pham T J Biol Chem. 2019; 294(15):5956-5969.
PMID: 30770471 PMC: 6463725. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006223.
Kinetic contribution to extracellular Na/K selectivity in the Na/K pump.
Vleeskens E, Clarke R FEBS Open Bio. 2018; 8(5):854-859.
PMID: 29744299 PMC: 5929939. DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12418.
Identification of electric-field-dependent steps in the Na(+),K(+)-pump cycle.
Mares L, Garcia A, Rasmussen H, Cornelius F, Mahmmoud Y, Berlin J Biophys J. 2014; 107(6):1352-63.
PMID: 25229143 PMC: 4167293. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.054.
Kinetic comparisons of heart and kidney Na+,K(+)-ATPases.
Garcia A, Rasmussen H, Apell H, Clarke R Biophys J. 2012; 103(4):677-88.
PMID: 22947929 PMC: 3443779. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.032.