» Articles » PMID: 21188415

Comparison of Maximal Unilateral Versus Bilateral Voluntary Contraction Force

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2010 Dec 29
PMID 21188415
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether the difference in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) forces between unilateral (UL) and bilateral (BL) contractions could be due to a difference in the timing of MVC peak force production between legs during BL MVC, or due to the maximal voluntary activation level (VAL) in each leg between UL and BL MVC. Thirteen active men (28 ± 6 years) volunteered to participate in an experimental session requiring the performance of MVC with right, left and both knee extensor muscles. An ergometer equipped with two strain gauges was used to assess the timing of MVC peak force production of each leg during BL MVC. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was used to investigate VAL and electromyography (EMG) activity. The present results showed that the sum of the right and left UL MVC was higher compared to BL MVC force, i.e., a BL deficit of force. The timing of MVC peak force production of each leg during BL MVC was not different, but BL MVC force was lower than the sum of BL MVC(R) and BL MVC(L) force (i.e., maximal force production of each leg during BL MVC). No changes of EMG activity, M-wave amplitude, VAL, and peak doublet between UL and BL contractions were observed. The difference found in the production of force during BL MVC cannot be explained by the timing of force production of each leg.

Citing Articles

Neuromuscular fatigability is not affected by the contraction pattern of exercises with a similar mean torque.

Lebesque L, Scaglioni G, Manckoundia P, Martin A Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39586887 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05660-7.


Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions.

Anders J, Smith C, Keller J, Hill E, Housh T, Schmidt R Sports (Basel). 2019; 7(7).

PMID: 31323817 PMC: 6681382. DOI: 10.3390/sports7070175.


Mitigating the bilateral deficit: reducing neural deficits through residual force enhancement and activation reduction.

MacDonald G, Mazara N, Herzog W, Power G Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018; 118(9):1911-1919.

PMID: 29959517 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3924-x.


Corticospinal and transcallosal modulation of unilateral and bilateral contractions of lower limbs.

Skarabot J, Alfonso R, Cronin N, Bon J, Strojnik V, Avela J Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016; 116(11-12):2197-2214.

PMID: 27628532 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3475-y.


Bilateral deficit in maximal force production.

Skarabot J, Cronin N, Strojnik V, Avela J Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016; 116(11-12):2057-2084.

PMID: 27582260 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3458-z.


References
1.
Janzen C, Chilibeck P, Davison K . The effect of unilateral and bilateral strength training on the bilateral deficit and lean tissue mass in post-menopausal women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006; 97(3):253-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0165-1. View

2.
Owings T, Grabiner M . Normally aging older adults demonstrate the bilateral deficit during ramp and hold contractions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998; 53(6):B425-9. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/53a.6.b425. View

3.
Oda S, Moritani T . Maximal isometric force and neural activity during bilateral and unilateral elbow flexion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994; 69(3):240-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF01094795. View

4.
Herbert R, Gandevia S . Muscle activation in unilateral and bilateral efforts assessed by motor nerve and cortical stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996; 80(4):1351-6. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.4.1351. View

5.
Allen G, McKenzie D, Gandevia S . Twitch interpolation of the elbow flexor muscles at high forces. Muscle Nerve. 1998; 21(3):318-28. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199803)21:3<318::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-d. View