» Articles » PMID: 21183849

Increased Short- and Long-term Mortality at Low-volume Pediatric Heart Transplant Centers: Should Minimum Standards Be Set? Retrospective Data Analysis

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2010 Dec 25
PMID 21183849
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The relationship between volume and outcome in many complex surgical procedures is well established.

Background: No published data has examined this relationship in pediatric cardiac transplantation, but low-volume adult heart transplant programs seem to have higher early mortality.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) provided center-specific data for the 4647 transplants performed on patients younger than 19 years old, 1992 to 2007. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the volume of transplants performed in the previous 5 years at that center: low [<19 transplants, n = 1135 (24.4%)], medium [19–62 transplants, n = 2321(50.0%)], and high [≥63 transplants, n= 1191 (25.6%)]. A logistic regression model for postoperative mortality was developed and observed-to-expected (O:E) mortality rates calculated for each group.

Results: Unadjusted long-term survival decreased with decreasing center volume (P<0.0001). Observed postoperative mortality was higher than expected at low-volume centers [O:E ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.83]. At low volume centers, high-risk patients (1.34, 0.85–2.12)--especially patients 1 year old or younger (1.60, 1.07–2.40) or those with congenital heart disease (1.36, 0.94–1.96)--did poorly, but those at high-volume centers did well (congenital heart disease: 0.90, 0.36–1.26; age<1 year: 0.75, 0.51–1.09). Similar results were obtained in the subset of patients transplanted after 1996. In multivariate logistic regression modeling, transplantation at a low-volume center was associated with an odds ratio for postoperative mortality of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.14–2.24); transplantation at a medium volume center had an odds ratio of 1.24 (95% CI, 0.92–1.66).

Conclusion: The volume of transplants performed at any one center has a significant impact on outcomes. Regionalization of care is one option for improving outcomes in pediatric cardiac transplantation.

Citing Articles

Center Variation in Indication and Short-Term Outcomes after Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Analysis of a Merged United Network for Organ Sharing - Pediatric Health Information System Cohort.

OConnor M, Zhang X, Griffis H, Fisher B, Getz K, Li Y Pediatr Cardiol. 2021; 43(3):636-644.

PMID: 34779880 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02768-x.


Characteristics Associated With High-Performing Pediatric Heart Transplant Centers in the United States From 2006 to 2015.

Singh T, Mehra M, Gauvreau K JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(11):e2023515.

PMID: 33136132 PMC: 7607438. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23515.


An Overview of Contemporary Outcomes in Fetal Cardiac Intervention: A Case for High-Volume Superspecialization?.

Kang S, Jaeggi E, Ryan G, Chaturvedi R Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 41(3):479-485.

PMID: 32198586 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-020-02294-2.


A model for geographic and sociodemographic access to care disparities for adults with congenital heart disease.

Salciccioli K, Oluyomi A, Lupo P, Ermis P, Lopez K Congenit Heart Dis. 2019; 14(5):752-759.

PMID: 31361081 PMC: 7463421. DOI: 10.1111/chd.12819.


Impact of pediatric cardiac surgery regionalization on health care utilization and mortality.

Sakai-Bizmark R, Mena L, Kumamaru H, Kawachi I, Marr E, Webber E Health Serv Res. 2019; 54(4):890-901.

PMID: 30916392 PMC: 6606551. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13137.