» Articles » PMID: 21178049

Diagnostic Value of Peritumoral Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Differentiation of Glioblastoma Multiforme from Solitary Metastatic Lesions

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2010 Dec 24
PMID 21178049
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In glioblastoma multiforme, the peritumoral region may be infiltrated with malignant cells in addition to vasogenic edema, whereas in a metastatic deposit, the peritumoral areas comprise predominantly vasogenic edema. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to differentiate glioblastoma from solitary metastasis on the basis of cellularity levels in the enhancing tumor and in the peritumoral region.

Materials And Methods: Seventy-three patients underwent conventional MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before undergoing treatment. The minimum ADC was measured in the enhancing tumor, peritumoral region, and contralateral normal white matter. To determine whether there was a statistical difference between metastasis and glioblastoma, we analyzed patient age and sex, minimum ADC value, and ADC ratio of the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff value of the minimum ADC that had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between glioblastoma and metastasis.

Results: The mean minimum ADC values and mean ADC ratios in the peritumoral regions of glioblastomas were significantly higher than those in metastases. However, the mean minimum ADC values and mean ADC ratios in enhancing tumors showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. According to ROC curve analysis, a cutoff value of 1.302 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for the minimum peritumoral ADC value generated the best combination of sensitivity (82.9%) and specificity (78.9%) for distinguishing between glioblastoma and metastasis.

Conclusion: Although the characteristics of solitary metastasis and glioblastoma multiforme may be similar on conventional MRI, DWI can offer diagnostic information to distinguish between the tumors.

Citing Articles

Utilizing Radiomics of Peri-Lesional Edema in T2-FLAIR Subtraction Digital Images to Distinguish High-Grade Glial Tumors From Brain Metastasis.

Demirel E, Dilek O J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 61(4):1728-1737.

PMID: 39254002 PMC: 11896942. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29572.


Evaluation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features and diagnostic effectiveness of grades II and III intracranial solitary fibroma.

Ran Y, Wang X, Zhang Y, Chen R, Liu C, Ran Y Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):377.

PMID: 39030639 PMC: 11264610. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01959-5.


Differentiation of glioma and solitary brain metastasis: a multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging study using histogram analysis.

Su Y, Cheng R, Guo J, Zhang M, Wang J, Ji H BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):805.

PMID: 38969990 PMC: 11225204. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12571-5.


Predicting glioblastoma recurrence using multiparametric MR imaging of non-enhancing peritumoral regions at baseline.

Xing Z, Wang C, Yang W, She D, Yang X, Cao D Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30411.

PMID: 38711642 PMC: 11070862. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30411.


Differentiating brain metastasis from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion MRI.

Kamimura K, Kamimura Y, Nakano T, Hasegawa T, Nakajo M, Yamada C Cancer Imaging. 2023; 23(1):75.

PMID: 37553578 PMC: 10410879. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00595-2.