» Articles » PMID: 21165978

Regular Mosaic of Synaptic Contacts Among Three Retinal Neurons

Overview
Journal J Comp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Dec 18
PMID 21165978
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Retinal bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells contact each other within precisely defined synaptic laminae, but the spatial distribution of contacts between the cells is generally treated as random. Here we show that not to be the case. Excitatory inputs to inner retinal neurons were visualized by introduction of a plasmid coding for the postsynaptic protein PSD95-GFP. Our initial finding was that synapses on the dendrites of retinal ganglion cells are regularly spaced, at 2-3-μm intervals, along the dendrites. Thus, the presence of a PSD95 punctum creates a nearby zone from which other inputs appear to be excluded. Despite their great variation in size and different morphologies, the spacing is similar for the arbors of different retinal ganglion cell types. Regular spacing was also observed for the starburst amacrine cells. This regularity is mirrored in the spacing of axonal varicosities of the stratified bipolar cells, which have a regular, nonrandom interval consistent with that of the PSD95 puncta on ganglion cells. Thus, for each level of the inner plexiform layer all three cell types participate in a single 2D mosaic of synaptic contacts. These findings raise a new set of questions: How does the self-avoidance of synaptic sites along an individual dendrite arise and how is it physically maintained? Why is a regular spacing of inputs important for the computational function of the cells? Finally, which of the three players, if any, is developmentally responsible for the initial establishment of the pattern?

Citing Articles

Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity.

Mauss A, Vlasits A, Borst A, Feller M Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017; 40:211-230.

PMID: 28418757 PMC: 6893907. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031335.


Brn3a and Brn3b knockout mice display unvaried retinal fine structure despite major morphological and numerical alterations of ganglion cells.

Ghinia M, Novelli E, Sajgo S, Badea T, Strettoi E J Comp Neurol. 2016; 527(1):187-211.

PMID: 27391320 PMC: 5219957. DOI: 10.1002/cne.24072.


A Role for Synaptic Input Distribution in a Dendritic Computation of Motion Direction in the Retina.

Vlasits A, Morrie R, Tran-Van-Minh A, Bleckert A, Gainer C, DiGregorio D Neuron. 2016; 89(6):1317-1330.

PMID: 26985724 PMC: 4883118. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.020.


Synapse Loss and Dendrite Remodeling in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma.

Berry R, Qu J, John S, Howell G, Jakobs T PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0144341.

PMID: 26637126 PMC: 4670161. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144341.


General features of the retinal connectome determine the computation of motion anticipation.

Johnston J, Lagnado L Elife. 2015; 4.

PMID: 25786068 PMC: 4391023. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06250.


References
1.
COOK J, Becker D, Kapila R . Independent mosaics of large inner- and outer-stratified ganglion cells in the goldfish retina. J Comp Neurol. 1992; 318(4):355-66. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903180402. View

2.
Nicholls J, Baylor D . Specific modalities and receptive fields of sensory neurons in CNS of the leech. J Neurophysiol. 1968; 31(5):740-56. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.5.740. View

3.
McGillem G, Dacheux R . Rabbit cone bipolar cells: correlation of their morphologies with whole-cell recordings. Vis Neurosci. 2002; 18(5):675-85. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523801185019. View

4.
Grueber W, Jan L, Jan Y . Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. Development. 2002; 129(12):2867-78. DOI: 10.1242/dev.129.12.2867. View

5.
Massey S, Mills S . A calbindin-immunoreactive cone bipolar cell type in the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol. 1996; 366(1):15-33. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960226)366:1<15::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-N. View