Evaluating Building Performance in Healthcare Facilities: an Organizational Perspective
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: Using the environment as a strategic tool is one of the most cost-effective and enduring approaches for improving public health; however, it is one that requires multiple perspectives. The purpose of this article is to highlight an innovative methodology that has been developed for conducting comprehensive performance evaluations in public sector health facilities in Canada.
Background: The building performance evaluation methodology described in this paper is a government initiative. The project team developed a comprehensive building evaluation process for all new capital health projects that would respond to the aforementioned need for stakeholders to be more accountable and to better integrate the larger organizational strategy of facilities.
Theoretical Framework: The Balanced Scorecard, which is a multiparadigmatic, performance-based business framework, serves as the underlying theoretical framework for this initiative. It was applied in the development of the conceptual model entitled the Building Performance Evaluation Scorecard, which provides the following benefits: (1) It illustrates a process to link facilities more effectively to the overall mission and goals of an organization; (2) It is both a measurement and a management system that has the ability to link regional facilities to measures of success and larger business goals; (3) It provides a standardized methodology that ensures consistency in assessing building performance; and (4) It is more comprehensive than traditional building evaluations.
Conclusion: The methodology presented in this paper is both a measurement and management system that integrates the principles of evidence-based design with the practices of pre- and post-occupancy evaluation. It promotes accountability and continues throughout the life cycle of a project. The advantage of applying this framework is that it engages health organizations in clarifying a vision and strategy for their facilities and helps translate those strategies into action and measurable performance outcomes.
Anaker A, von Koch L, Sjostrand C, Bernhardt J, Elf M PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0177477.
PMID: 28727727 PMC: 5519004. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177477.
Evidence-based design in an intensive care unit: end-user perceptions.
Ferri M, Zygun D, Harrison A, Stelfox H BMC Anesthesiol. 2015; 15:57.
PMID: 25907437 PMC: 4414278. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0038-4.
Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments-time to begin improving quality.
Elf M, Frost P, Lindahl G, Wijk H BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:114.
PMID: 25888922 PMC: 4373305. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0782-7.
Ferri M, Zygun D, Harrison A, Stelfox H BMJ Open. 2013; 3(7).
PMID: 23872295 PMC: 3717444. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003134.