» Articles » PMID: 21165758

Evaluation of the Acetaldehyde Production and Degradation Potential of 26 Enological Saccharomyces and Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Strains in a Resting Cell Model System

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2010 Dec 18
PMID 21165758
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acetaldehyde is relevant for wine aroma, wine color, and microbiological stability. Yeast are known to play a crucial role in production and utilization of acetaldehyde during fermentations but comparative quantitative data are scarce. This research evaluated the acetaldehyde metabolism of 26 yeast strains, including commercial Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces, in a reproducible resting cell model system. Acetaldehyde kinetics and peak values were highly genus, species, and strain dependent. Peak acetaldehyde values varied from 2.2 to 189.4 mg l(-1) and correlated well (r(2) = 0.92) with the acetaldehyde production yield coefficients that ranged from 0.4 to 42 mg acetaldehyde per g of glucose in absence of SO(2). S. pombe showed the highest acetaldehyde production yield coefficients and peak values. All other non-Saccharomyces species produced significantly less acetaldehyde than the S. cerevisiae strains and were less affected by SO(2) additions. All yeast strains could degrade acetaldehyde as sole substrate, but the acetaldehyde degradation rates did not correlate with acetaldehyde peak values or acetaldehyde production yield coefficients in incubations with glucose as sole substrate.

Citing Articles

Copper (II) Level in Musts Affects Acetaldehyde Concentration, Phenolic Composition, and Chromatic Characteristics of Red and White Wines.

Errichiello F, Picariello L, Forino M, Blaiotta G, Petruzziello E, Moio L Molecules. 2024; 29(12).

PMID: 38930972 PMC: 11206618. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29122907.


Selection of a Probiotic for Its Potential for Developing a Synbiotic Peach and Grape Juice.

Prieto-Santiago V, Aguilo-Aguayo I, Ortiz-Sola J, Anguera M, Abadias M Foods. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38275717 PMC: 10814886. DOI: 10.3390/foods13020350.


Ethanolic Fermentation of Rye Mashes: Factors Influencing the Formation of Aldehydes and Process Efficiency.

Pielech-Przybylska K, Balcerek M, Klebeko M, Dziekonska-Kubczak U, Hebdzynski M Biomolecules. 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36008979 PMC: 9405562. DOI: 10.3390/biom12081085.


Acetaldehyde kinetics of enological yeast during alcoholic fermentation in grape must.

Li E, Mira de Orduna R J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016; 44(2):229-236.

PMID: 27896529 DOI: 10.1007/s10295-016-1879-7.

References
1.
Lachenmeier D, Sohnius E . The role of acetaldehyde outside ethanol metabolism in the carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages: evidence from a large chemical survey. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008; 46(8):2903-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.034. View

2.
Bely M, Stoeckle P, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Dubourdieu D . Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii-Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 122(3):312-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.023. View

3.
Longo E, Velazquez J, Sieiro C, Cansado J, Calo P, Villa T . Production of higher alcohols, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde and other compounds by 14Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains isolated from the same region (Salnés, N.W. Spain). World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 8(5):539-41. DOI: 10.1007/BF01201958. View

4.
Then R, Radler F . [Regulation of the acetaldehyde concentration in culture medium during the fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Arch Mikrobiol. 1970; 72(1):60-7. View

5.
Herrero M, Garcia L, Diaz M . The effect of SO2 on the production of ethanol, acetaldehyde, organic acids, and flavor volatiles during industrial cider fermentation. J Agric Food Chem. 2003; 51(11):3455-9. DOI: 10.1021/jf021015e. View