» Articles » PMID: 21160878

In Vivo Miniature Robots for Natural Orifice Surgery: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2010 Dec 17
PMID 21160878
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is the integration of laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery techniques with endoscopic technology. Despite the advances in NOTES technology, the approach presents several unique instrumentation and technique-specific challenges. Current flexible endoscopy platforms for NOTES have several drawbacks including limited stability, triangulation and dexterity, and lack of adequate visualization, suggesting the need for new and improved instrumentation for this approach. Much of the current focus is on the development of flexible endoscopy platforms that incorporate robotic technology. An alternative approach to access the abdominal viscera for either a laparoscopic or NOTES procedure is the use of small robotic devices that can be implanted in an intracorporeal manner. Multiple, independent, miniature robots can be simultaneously inserted into the abdominal cavity to provide a robotic platform for NOTES surgery. The capabilities of the robots include imaging, retraction, tissue and organ manipulation, and precise maneuverability in the abdominal cavity. Such a platform affords several advantages including enhanced visualization, better surgical dexterity and improved triangulation for NOTES. This review discusses the current status and future perspectives of this novel miniature robotics platform for the NOTES approach. Although these technologies are still in pre-clinical development, a miniature robotics platform provides a unique method for addressing the limitations of minimally invasive surgery, and NOTES in particular.

Citing Articles

A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer.

Mohd Azman Z, Kim S Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 1:5.

PMID: 28138573 PMC: 5244655. DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.16.


Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Weaver A, Steele S F1000Res. 2016; 5.

PMID: 27746895 PMC: 5040148. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.9389.1.


Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015.

Kwak J, Kim S Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48(2):427-35.

PMID: 26875201 PMC: 4843749. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2015.478.


A miniaturized robotic platform for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: in vivo validation.

Tognarelli S, Salerno M, Tortora G, Quaglia C, Dario P, Schurr M Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(12):3477-84.

PMID: 25676200 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4097-x.


A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS.

Arkenbout E, Henselmans P, Jelinek F, Breedveld P Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(6):1281-96.

PMID: 25249149 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3816-z.


References
1.
Wagh M, Merrifield B, Thompson C . Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 3(9):892-6. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00296-x. View

2.
Zacks S, Sandler R, Rutledge R, Brown Jr R . A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(2):334-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05466.x. View

3.
Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Ahmed S, Farritor S, Oleynikov D . Mobile in vivo camera robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005; 20(1):135-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0205-7. View

4.
Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P . Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63(2):307-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.035. View

5.
Roumm A, Pizzi L, Goldfarb N, Cohn H . Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Innov. 2005; 12(3):261-87. DOI: 10.1177/155335060501200313. View