» Articles » PMID: 21157923

The Tail of Tyrannosaurus: Reassessing the Size and Locomotive Importance of the M. Caudofemoralis in Non-avian Theropods

Overview
Date 2010 Dec 16
PMID 21157923
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlike extant birds and mammals, most non-avian theropods had large muscular tails, with muscle arrangements similar to those of modern reptiles. Examination of ornithomimid and tyrannosaurid tails revealed sequential diagonal scarring on the lateral faces of four or more hemal spines that consistently correlates with the zone of the tail just anterior to the disappearance of the vertebral transverse processes. This sequential scarring is interpreted as the tapering boundary between the insertions of the M. caudofemoralis and the M. ilioischiocaudalis. Digital muscle reconstructions based on measurements of fossil specimens and dissections of modern reptiles showed that the M. caudofemoralis of many non-avian theropods was exceptionally large. These high caudofemoral mass estimates are consistent with the elevation of the transverse processes of the caudal vertebra above the centrum, which creates an enlarged hypaxial region. Dorsally elevated transverse processes are characteristic of even primitive theropods and suggest that a large M. caudofemoralis is a basal characteristic of the group. In the genus Tyrannosaurus, the mass of the M. caudofemoralis was further increased by dorsoventrally lengthening the hemal arches. The expanded M. caudofemoralis of Tyrannosaurus may have evolved as compensation for the animal's immense size. Because the M. caudofemoralis is the primary hind limb retractor, large M. caudofemoralis masses and the resulting contractile force and torque estimates presented here indicate a sizable investment in locomotive muscle among theropods with a range of body sizes and give new evidence in favor of greater athleticism, in terms of overall cursoriality, balance, and turning agility.

Citing Articles

Reconstructing dinosaur locomotion.

Falkingham P Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240441.

PMID: 39809325 PMC: 11732409. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0441.


Estimating body volumes and surface areas of animals from cross-sections.

Zhao R PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17479.

PMID: 38827295 PMC: 11141563. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17479.


Big boned: How fat storage and other adaptations influenced large theropod foraging ecology.

Pahl C, Ruedas L PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0290459.

PMID: 37910492 PMC: 10619836. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290459.


Anatomically grounded estimation of hindlimb muscle sizes in Archosauria.

Cuff A, Wiseman A, Bishop P, Michel K, Gaignet R, Hutchinson J J Anat. 2022; 242(2):289-311.

PMID: 36206401 PMC: 9877486. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13767.


The appendicular myology of Stegoceras validum (Ornithischia: Pachycephalosauridae) and implications for the head-butting hypothesis.

Moore B, Roloson M, Currie P, Ryan M, Patterson R, Mallon J PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0268144.

PMID: 36048811 PMC: 9436104. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268144.