» Articles » PMID: 21156876

Repetition is Easy: Why Repeated Referents Have Reduced Prominence

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Dec 16
PMID 21156876
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The repetition and the predictability of a word in a conversation are two factors that are believed to affect whether it is emphasized: predictable, repeated words are less acoustically prominent than unpredictable, new words. However, because predictability and repetition are correlated, it is unclear whether speakers lengthen unpredictable words to facilitate comprehension or whether this lengthening is the result of difficulties in accessing a new (nonrepeated) lexical item. In this study, we investigated the relationship between acoustic prominence, repetition, and predictability in a description task. In Experiment 1, we found that repeated referents are produced with reduced prominence, even when these referents are unexpected. In Experiment 2, we found that predictability and repetition both have independent effects on duration and intensity. However, word duration was primarily determined by repetition, and intensity was primarily determined by predictability. The results are most consistent with an account in which multiple cognitive factors influence the acoustic prominence of a word.

Citing Articles

Increased vowel contrast and intelligibility in connected speech induced by sensorimotor adaptation.

Beach S, Johnson S, Parrell B, Parrell B, Niziolek C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39149284 PMC: 11326165. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.04.606537.


Relating referential clarity and phonetic clarity in infant-directed speech.

Beech C, Swingley D Dev Sci. 2023; 27(2):e13442.

PMID: 37612886 PMC: 10884346. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13442.


Semantic focus mediates pitch auditory feedback control in phrasal prosody.

Hilger A, Cole J, Larson C Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 38(3):328-345.

PMID: 37065842 PMC: 10103821. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2116060.


It's Mine, . . . It's Mine: Unsolicited Repetitions Are Reduced in Toddlers.

Tendera A, Rispoli M, Sethilselvan A, Chon H, Loucks T Lang Speech. 2022; 66(3):734-755.

PMID: 36154743 PMC: 10394958. DOI: 10.1177/00238309221119185.


Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction.

Jacobs C, Loucks T, Watson D, Dell G Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022; 35(4):485-497.

PMID: 35992578 PMC: 9390968. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051.


References
1.
Onishi K, Chambers K, Fisher C . Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition. 2002; 83(1):B13-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00165-2. View

2.
Baker R, Bradlow A . Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody. Lang Speech. 2010; 52(Pt 4):391-413. PMC: 2841971. DOI: 10.1177/0023830909336575. View

3.
Bell A, Jurafsky D, Fosler-Lussier E, Girand C, Gregory M, Gildea D . Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 113(2):1001-24. DOI: 10.1121/1.1534836. View

4.
Warker J, Dell G . Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(2):387-98. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.387. View

5.
Pluymaekers M, Ernestus M, Baayen R . Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 118(4):2561-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.2011150. View