» Articles » PMID: 21155950

Different Regional Brain Activity During Physiological Gastric Distension Compared to Balloon Distension: a H2 15O-PET Study

Overview
Date 2010 Dec 16
PMID 21155950
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Stepwise gastric balloon distension progressively activates a 'visceral pain neuromatrix', ultimately inducing discomfort and pain. On the other hand, normal meal ingestion requires gastric volume expansion without induction of pain. The aim was to test the hypothesis that physiological gastric distension (liquid meal infusion) until maximal satiation elicits brain responses similar to balloon distension at discomfort threshold.

Methods: Brain H(2) (15) O-positron emission tomography (PET) was performed in two different groups of healthy volunteers (both n=14) during continuous and stepwise infusion of a liquid meal through a nasogastric tube, until maximal satiation. Brain (de)activation patterns were compared with historical controls in which discomfort was elicited using gastric balloon distension. This latter reference group was acquired on the same scanner using the same acquisition protocol; all data were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM2). Within each group, brain activity at maximal distension was compared to baseline activity and between-group comparisons were made.

Key Results: Intragastric volumes and satiation/gastric sensation scores at endpoint were similar in all groups. Continuous and stepwise nutrient infusion was associated with progressive deactivations in key areas of the 'visceral pain neuromatrix' that were activated during balloon distension. Additionally, stepwise infusion progressively activated prefrontal areas and showed deactivations in 'default network' brain regions also found to be deactivated during balloon distension.

Conclusions & Inferences: Compared to gastric balloon distension, physiological gastric distension using nutrient infusion elicits opposite brain responses in the 'visceral pain neuromatrix', but similar responses in other areas. We interpret this finding as a prerequisite for tolerance of normal meal volumes in health.

Citing Articles

The vagus nerve mediates the stomach-brain coherence in rats.

Cao J, Wang X, Chen J, Zhang N, Liu Z Neuroimage. 2022; 263:119628.

PMID: 36113737 PMC: 10008817. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119628.


Gastrointestinal Interoception in Eating Disorders: Charting a New Path.

Khalsa S, Berner L, Anderson L Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022; 24(1):47-60.

PMID: 35061138 PMC: 8898253. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-022-01318-3.


Good taste or gut feeling? A new method in rats shows oro-sensory stimulation and gastric distention generate distinct and overlapping brain activation patterns.

Roelofs T, Luijendijk M, van der Toorn A, Camps G, Smeets P, Dijkhuizen R Int J Eat Disord. 2020; 54(7):1116-1126.

PMID: 32671875 PMC: 8359261. DOI: 10.1002/eat.23354.


Bidirectional brain-gut interactions: Involvement of noradrenergic transmission within the ventral part of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Ide S, Yamamoto R, Takeda H, Minami M Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2018; 38(1):37-43.

PMID: 30106262 PMC: 7292304. DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12004.


The Effects of a Normal Rate versus a Slow Intervalled Rate of Oral Nutrient Intake and Intravenous Low Rate Macronutrient Application on Psychophysical Function - Two Pilot Studies.

Denzer-Lippmann M, Bachlechner S, Wielopolski J, Fischer M, Buettner A, Doerfler A Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1031.

PMID: 28701972 PMC: 5487446. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01031.